Making a synthetic tar/pitch material for a robot

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magnus Wootton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pitch
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the creation of shock-absorbent material for a robot using glycerine poly chloride, generated through the electrolysis of salt to produce chlorine ions. Concerns are raised about the safety of handling chlorine gas and the risks associated with hydrogen production during the process. Suggestions include using alternating current to separate gas volumes and ensuring proper ventilation to prevent explosive mixtures. The original poster proposes a method involving a high voltage power supply to ionize chlorine from a dry salt brick in an airtight container. However, this approach is criticized as impractical and dangerous, with warnings against attempting such experiments without proper knowledge and safety measures. The conversation emphasizes the need for safer alternatives and cautions against proceeding with potentially hazardous methods.
Magnus Wootton
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I'm interested in making some shock absorbant material to make a robot from.
I've got the main idea down, you just keep inject chlorine ions into refluxing glycerine and it eventually becomes glycerine poly chloride, taking about a week.

I have things I need to iron out about it.

a) if I do it inside of a solvent, I'm afraid the solvent will thermally decompose, so I'm thinking I only add once its relatively thick, then I decompose the solvent less. And I use an alkane like hexane or an alkene like xylene so it doesnt react to the alcohol or the acid.

b) I'm releasing hydrogen into my chlorine vessel, from an electrode, and I'm wondering if I put a spark gap in it, itll turn it into hydrogen chloride so I dont build up hydrogen pressure, but it has oxygen and water with it, so its going to also generate water, and thats going to build up in the system.

SO you can see i'm having fun, I just wish I could talk to someone about it.


TTNeS1y.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Magnus Wootton said:
you just keep inject chlorine ions

From your description you are planning on using not ions, but just chlorine generated by the kitchen salt electrolysis. Chlorine is nasty, are you sure you know how/are prepared to deal with it?

To avoid any reactions of chlorine with hydrogen (they can potentially go kaboom) use AC and separate cathode and anode volumes to not allow mixing of the gases. Hydrogen itself can explode if mixed with oxygen, whether it is really a problem depends on the amounts produced and speed at which the gas is produced (you have to avoid building up amounts, so good ventilation is a must, just like with chlorine).

In general it is not something that I would suggest as the first experiment to someone inexperienced. Are you sure the product will have properties better than some ready and much safer to use rubber/silicone materials?
 
Borek said:
Hydrogen itself can explode if mixed with oxygen, whether it is really a problem depends on the amounts produced and speed at which the gas is produced
And the speed at which you can run.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes DrJohn and berkeman
Its hard to see from my bad pictures what's going on.

But, I've got a safer setup.

So what I'm going to do is get a high voltage high frequency power supply, and then get a dry salt brick and then ionize the chlorine out of it, in an air tight container. (like a milo tin.)

cause I need the chlorine perfectly anhydrous, and without much impurity, and this just pipes to the glycerine, I should be able to see the chlorine in there to know if its coming out of the brick or not. the brick is supposed to be turning into sodium metal! by im not sure to what degree this happens, but im sure chlorine comes out regardless.

then its just adding the dry chloride ions to the glycerine, then you get synthetic tar from it.

its just is to just keep converting water into acid, and the glycerine solidifies.

Its not better than silicone or anything out there, its just possibly stronger than the last thing I made, which was glycerine citrate, and its really cheap! cause u get sea salt $1 a kg!!!

Maybe its passable as a building material, and costs me less if I make it myself!

CdMDCEx.png
 
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy
Magnus Wootton said:
But, I've got a safer setup.

Quite the opposite.

Magnus Wootton said:
So what I'm going to do is get a high voltage high frequency power supply, and then get a dry salt brick and then ionize the chlorine out of it, in an air tight container. (like a milo tin.)

Now you are just in the realms of fantasy. You are not going to "ionize chlorine out of a solid" unless perhaps in a MV range (or even higher). There are reasons why all industrial and lab procedures work with liquids (solutions, or, sometimes, molten salts). Even then, you don't want chlorine ions, but chlorine gas. I tried to push you into the right direction, but you prefer to stay in a fairies world. Please don't go this way, otherwise you are going to kill yourself.

Topic locked, apparently there is no way to make it safe, as you don't listen to what you are being told.
 
  • Like
Likes DrJohn, BillTre and Vanadium 50
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top