Managing Nuclear Waste: Solutions and Potential Risks in Fusion Power Plants

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kleinwolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the management of nuclear waste in the context of fusion power plants. It highlights that placing fission products into a fusion reactor is impractical due to the high energy requirements for fusion reactions, which necessitate temperatures in the billion K range. The conversation emphasizes that nuclear waste can be safely stored underground for tens of thousands of years, leveraging well-understood materials science. Furthermore, it points out that the media often misrepresents the science behind nuclear waste disposal, despite its proven effectiveness and environmental benefits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fusion and fission processes
  • Knowledge of plasma physics and energy losses in magnetically confined plasma
  • Familiarity with nuclear waste management techniques
  • Basic principles of materials science related to radioactive materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of fusion energy and its temperature requirements
  • Study the effects of bremsstrahlung and cyclotron radiation in plasma physics
  • Explore advanced nuclear waste storage solutions and their long-term viability
  • Investigate the media's portrayal of nuclear energy and waste management
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for nuclear engineers, environmental scientists, policymakers, and anyone involved in the development and management of nuclear energy systems.

kleinwolf
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
I noticed there were several ways for trying to solve that problem :

1) secretely leave them somewhere (seas,...)
2) try to make extra places for them
3) retreat them (superphenix,aso...)

Does somebody know what happen if those highly radioactive waste are put into a long-time wokring fusion power plant, with temp. > 100 mio. K ?? maybe if this is not enough energy to fusion very heavy nuclei, they will follow a kind of thermal desintegration into maybe other much more lighter elements ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Putting nuclear waste, and by that I mean fission products in a fusion reactor would not be practical. For one, most fusion reactions would require high energies to occur - so temperatures would have to be in the billion K range. The other problem would be considerable energy losses due to brehmsstrahlung and cyclotron radiation - assuming the fusion process would occur in a magnetically confined plasma.

Energy losses from a plasma increase with Z, the atomic number, because this is the number electrons that would be available from an atom with atomic numbe Z.
 
Actually the science behind nuclear waste disposal has often been grossly misrepresented by the media. We know more or less how to store them safely underground for tens of thousands of years, with tiny variance in error.

The materials science is well understood and used everyday with great succes.

there's some complications when you transport them, but that too is not really a problem.

Essentially, its a perfectly working, environmentally clean system, its ashame its so often distorted given the obvious benefits of nuclear energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
Replies
20
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K