Map from space spanned by 2 complex conjugate vars to R^2

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mapping of a region in the space \(\mathbb{C}^2\) spanned by two complex conjugate variables to the real plane \(\mathbb{R}^2\). Participants explore the implications of treating \(\mathbb{C}^2\) as a vector space and the nature of the scalar field involved, considering both theoretical and mathematical perspectives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how to map a region of \(\mathbb{C}^2\) spanned by complex conjugate variables \(z\) and \(\bar{z}\) to \(\mathbb{R}^2\).
  • Another participant questions the meaning of 'spanning' and asks for clarification on the scalar field being used, noting that it affects the outcome.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of elements in \(\mathbb{C}^2\), with a focus on the ordered pair of the form \((a+bi, a-bi)\).
  • A participant explains that \(\mathbb{C}^2\) can be viewed as a two-dimensional vector space over \(\mathbb{C}\) and a four-dimensional vector space over \(\mathbb{R}\), leading to different interpretations of the mapping.
  • It is noted that the one-dimensional subspace generated by the element \((a+bi, a-bi)\) will not be isomorphic to \(\mathbb{R}^2\), but there may be a natural bijection between the subspace and \(\mathbb{R}^2\) when viewed over \(\mathbb{C}\).
  • A summary is provided that emphasizes the dependence of the span on whether the scalars \(c_1\) and \(c_2\) are complex or real.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the scalar field and the nature of the mapping, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of defining the scalar field and the implications of viewing \(\mathbb{C}^2\) as a vector space, which are not fully resolved within the thread.

Jamz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I would like your help understanding how to map a region of the space \mathbb{C}^2 spanned by two complex conjugate variables to the real plane \mathbb{R}^2 .

Specifically, let us think that we have two complex conugate variables z and \bar{ z} and we define a triangle in the space represented schematically by having z in the abscissa and \bar{z} in the ordinate. I know this \mathbb{C}^2 space shold be isomorphic to \mathbb{R}^4 , but considering the constraint that the variables are conjugate, I am hopping one can map such region to a representation in \mathbb{R}^2 .

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamz said:
how to map a region of the space \mathbb{C}^2 spanned by two complex conjugate variables to the real plane \mathbb{R}^2 .
Crucial information is missing from the question. When you talk about 'spanning' it sounds like you want to consider ##\mathbb C^2## as a vector space. If so, what is the related scalar field - ##\mathbb R## or ##\mathbb C##? Each one leads to a different answer.

Also, what do you mean by 'spanned by two complex conjugate variables'? An element of ##\mathbb C^2## is an ordered pair of complex numbers ##(z_1,z_2)##. Are you referring to an ordered pair of the form ##(a+bi,a-bi)##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamz
andrewkirk said:
Crucial information is missing from the question. When you talk about 'spanning' it sounds like you want to consider ##\mathbb C^2## as a vector space. If so, what is the related scalar field - ##\mathbb R## or ##\mathbb C##? Each one leads to a different answer.

Also, what do you mean by 'spanned by two complex conjugate variables'? An element of ##\mathbb C^2## is an ordered pair of complex numbers ##(z_1,z_2)##. Are you referring to an ordered pair of the form ##(a+bi,a-bi)##?

You are right, sorry for the misuse. I thought that seeing it as vector space with basis ##\{ \partial_{z},\partial_{\bar{z}} \}## would mean the same. But let us forget about that. What I am saying is precisely what you wrote:

I am referring to an ordered pair of the form ##(a+bi,a-bi)##
 
Jamz said:
You are right, sorry for the misuse. I thought that seeing it as vector space with basis ##\{ \partial_{z},\partial_{\bar{z}} \}## would mean the same. But let us forget about that. What I am saying is precisely what you wrote:

I am referring to an ordered pair of the form ##(a+bi,a-bi)##
You haven't answered the question about the scalar field.
andrewkirk said:
If so, what is the related scalar field - ##\mathbb R## or ##\mathbb C##? Each one leads to a different answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamz
A ##n##-dimensional vector space over field ##F## is isomorphic to the vector space ##F^n##.

##\mathbb C^2## can be considered as a two-dimensional vector space over scalar field ##\mathbb C## and a four-dimensional vector space over scalar field ##\mathbb R##. In the latter case it is isomorphic to ##\mathbb R^4## over scalar field ##\mathbb R##.

The question is about the vector space generated by element ##(a+bi,a-bi)##, which is a single element of whatever vector space we are considering. So it generates a one-dimensional subspace.

Using the theorem of the first paragraph, over scalar field ##\mathbb C## that one-dimensional subspace will be isomorphic to ##\mathbb C^1=\mathbb C##. And over ##\mathbb R## it will be isomorphic to ##\mathbb R^1=\mathbb R##.

Either way it will not be isomorphic to ##\mathbb R^2##. However in the first case (ie over ##\mathbb C##), there will be a natural, intuitive bijection between the subspace and ##\mathbb R^2##, in the same way that there is a natural, intuitive bijection between ##\mathbb C## and ##\mathbb R##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamz
To summarize : span is ## \{ c1(a+bi)+c2(a-bi)\} ## and it will depend on whether ##c_1, c_2 ## are Complex or Real scalars.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K