Marble Stack Equilibrium: Solving for Forces at Contact Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter HoodedFreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marble Static
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two uniform marbles stacked in a container, focusing on the forces exerted at their points of contact and the forces each marble exerts on the other. The subject area includes concepts of equilibrium, forces, and torques in a static system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometry of the problem and the locations of contact points A, B, and C. There are attempts to analyze the torques acting on the marbles and the forces at play, with some questioning how to determine the lever arm for point C and the validity of treating the marbles as a single system.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem, including the geometry and forces involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of free body diagrams and the relationships between the forces and torques, but no consensus has been reached on specific calculations or methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of specific measurements for the height of point C and the implications of treating the two marbles as a single system despite them not being physically attached.

HoodedFreak
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two uniform, 75.0-g marbles 2.00 cm in diameter are stacked as shown in Fig. P11.75 in a container that is 3.00 cm wide. (a) Find the force that the container exerts on the marbles at the points of contact A, B, and C. (b) What force does each marble exert on the other?

Homework Equations


T = F*l = 0
F = ma = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I just cannot figure out the geometry of this problem, at all, which I need to even begin the question. How do I know where the point of contact of the two marbles is?
 

Attachments

  • Problem 3.png
    Problem 3.png
    17 KB · Views: 1,124
Physics news on Phys.org
The points of contact are labeled in the figure as A, B and C. How far do you think A and B are from the bottom left corner of the container? What about point C?
 
kuruman said:
The points of contact are labeled in the figure as A, B and C. How far do you think A and B are from the bottom left corner of the container? What about point C?

A is 1 cm above, B is 1 cm to the right, and C I don't know. I know that Force B would be equal to 0.075*2*g, and all I can say about force C and force A are that they are equal and opposite to each other
 
Last edited:
What can you say about the torques generated by all the external forces acting on the two marbles? Can you find expressions about some origin, say point A?
 
kuruman said:
What can you say about the torques generated by all the external forces acting on the two marbles? Can you find expressions about some origin, say point A?
Okay, well if I look at the torque of the first marble about point A, we have the torque from the force of the wall at A being zero, then we have the torque of the Force B being 0.15*g*1, and the torque of the second marble acting on the first, which I don't know how to find
 
Your last message is incomplete. Anyway, point B is better for calculating torques because two of them are zero about that point. I think you were going to say that you don't know how to find the lever arm of point C about B. You need to figure out the sine and cosine of the angle formed by the center-to-center distance and the horizontal. It's simple trig.
 
kuruman said:
Your last message is incomplete. Anyway, point B is better for calculating torques because two of them are zero about that point. I think you were going to say that you don't know how to find the lever arm of point C about B. You need to figure out the sine and cosine of the angle formed by the center-to-center distance and the horizontal. It's simple trig.

My last message is complete I just forgot to put the period. Which two torques are zero about point B? And why are we looking for the lever arm of point C when point C is not in contact with the bottom left marble.
 
The torques that are zero about point B are the ones generated by the normal force at B and the weight of the bottom marble. Point C is not in contact with the bottom marble but it is in contact with the top marble. If you consider as your system the two marbles together then you don't have to worry about the contact force between the two marbles which is what you are asked to find in part (b). If you try to do this problem with a free body diagram (FBD) of only one marble, you will end up with too many unknowns and you will have to draw another FBD for the second marble. Therefore, you might as well draw the FBD for both marbles together in the first place and be done with. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mitchel Haas
kuruman said:
The torques that are zero about point B are the ones generated by the normal force at B and the weight of the bottom marble. Point C is not in contact with the bottom marble but it is in contact with the top marble. If you consider as your system the two marbles together then you don't have to worry about the contact force between the two marbles which is what you are asked to find in part (b). If you try to do this problem with a free body diagram (FBD) of only one marble, you will end up with too many unknowns and you will have to draw another FBD for the second marble. Therefore, you might as well draw the FBD for both marbles together in the first place and be done with. :wink:

I see, okay. But why is it valid to treat them both as one system together since they are not attached to each other?

Okay, so if I treat them as a system together, then the lever arm at point C would simply be the vertical distance to point C, but we aren't given how high above the bottom of the jar point C is, how would I find that?
 
  • #10
It doesn't matter that the two marbles are not attached to one another. The beauty of the FBD idea (thanks to Sir Isaac Newton) is that you can consider any number of objects as your "system" as long as you account correctly for the external forces (those outside the system) that act on the components of this system.

Anyway, start at point B and draw a line to the center of the bottom marble then draw a line to the center of the top marble then to point C. Draw a right triangle that has horizontal and vertical right sides and the center-to-center line segment as its hypotenuse. Do the trig on this right triangle to find the overall vertical displacement that takes you to point C. As I wrote earlier, you need to figure out the sine and cosine of the angle formed by the center-to-center distance and the horizontal.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
It doesn't matter that the two marbles are not attached to one another. The beauty of the FBD idea (thanks to Sir Isaac Newton) is that you can consider any number of objects as your "system" as long as you account correctly for the external forces (those outside the system) that act on the components of this system.

Anyway, start at point B and draw a line to the center of the bottom marble then draw a line to the center of the top marble then to point C. Draw a right triangle that has horizontal and vertical right sides and the center-to-center line segment as its hypotenuse. Do the trig on this right triangle to find the overall vertical displacement that takes you to point C. As I wrote earlier, you need to figure out the sine and cosine of the angle formed by the center-to-center distance and the horizontal.

How do you know what the center to center distance is? Clearly the horizontal distance of the centers would be 1, but how do you know the distance from one center to another?
 
  • #12
Marbles.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mitchel Haas
  • #13
What is the distance from F to D? Hint: Point F is at the center of the circle and point D is on the circumference. How about from D to G? Add the two. (Thanks for the drawing, Nidum)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Nidum said:

Why did you draw a straight line between the two centers, isn't it possible to have the two centers not lie on a line through both their radiuses, I'd draw what I mean, but paint won't allow me to, something along these lines
 

Attachments

  • Problem 3.png
    Problem 3.png
    17.6 KB · Views: 813
  • #15
Imagine a plane that is tangent to the two marbles at the point of contact. The line connecting the center of one marble to the point of contact is perpendicular to that plane and so is the line connecting the center of the other marble to the point of contact. Since these two lines are perpendicular to the same plane, they must be parallel; since they pass though the same point (the point of contact) they form a straight line between the two centers, just like Nidum drew. Your drawing shows two line segments that do not go through the point of contact and are not a straight line from one center to the other. The center to center straight line must go through the point of contact.
 
  • #16
kuruman said:
Imagine a plane that is tangent to the two marbles at the point of contact. The line connecting the center of one marble to the point of contact is perpendicular to that plane and so is the line connecting the center of the other marble to the point of contact. Since these two lines are perpendicular to the same plane, they must be parallel; since they pass though the same point (the point of contact) they form a straight line between the two centers, just like Nidum drew. Your drawing shows two line segments that do not go through the point of contact and are not a straight line from one center to the other. The center to center straight line must go through the point of contact.

I see, that makes perfect sense thanks for the explanation. Okay, so now I form the triangle with horizontal 1 and hypotenuse 2, solving for the height gives me √(22 - 12 = √3. So a total vertical distance of √3 + 1. So the torque on the system from point C woould be Fc * (√3 + 1).

So i get that Fa = Fc*(√3 + 1), I must have done something wrong since I previously got Fa = Fc when I balance the forces in the x direction.
 
  • #17
It is still true that FA = FC. The contradiction arises because you forgot the torque generated by the weight of the top marble. Also, use symbols instead of a mix of symbols and numbers. If you use 1 for the radius, you might get in trouble when you plug into find numerical values. Use R for radius, then plug in at the very end. When you eventually find the forces they should be a number times mg, the weight of one marble.
 
  • #18
kuruman said:
It is still true that FA = FC. The contradiction arises because you forgot the torque generated by the weight of the top marble.

Right, okay, so the center of gravity in between the two balls should be at a horizontal distance of 1.5 from the corner, which is 0.5 from point B, so the torque due to grabity would be 0.5*0.15g, so in the end we have 0.075g + Fa = (√3 + 1)Fa, which gives me 0.075g = √3Fa, and in the end, We get Fa = 0.42N = Fc. And Fb = 1.4715.

b) For the force of each marble on the other, we have that for the forces in the x direction of the bottom marble, Fm * cosθ = Fa

From the triangle we formed before, cosθ would be 1/2, so we get Fm = Fa*2 = 0.84N.

Is that right?
 
  • #19
That's right.
 
  • #20
kuruman said:
That's right.

Great thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K