Marketing and science don't always mix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques the marketing strategies of Coca-Cola, particularly regarding the branding of their "Energy drink" as zero calories. Participants highlight the misleading nature of such marketing, suggesting that terms like "GMO-free" and "green energy" are omitted for commercial gain. The conversation emphasizes the disconnect between scientific accuracy and marketing embellishments, arguing that effective products do not require excessive marketing hype. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that modesty in scientific representation often clashes with the aggressive tactics of marketing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of marketing principles and consumer psychology
  • Familiarity with nutritional science, particularly calorie content
  • Knowledge of branding strategies in the beverage industry
  • Awareness of the implications of labeling such as "GMO-free" and "gluten-free"
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective marketing strategies in the beverage industry
  • Explore the impact of nutritional labeling on consumer behavior
  • Investigate the science behind caffeine and its effects on energy levels
  • Learn about ethical marketing practices and transparency in product labeling
USEFUL FOR

Marketing professionals, beverage industry analysts, nutritionists, and consumers interested in understanding the intersection of science and marketing in product branding.

scottdave
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
2,009
Reaction score
974
Do you think Coke was thinking science when naming this "Energy drink" ??
Do they know how much energy zero calories represents?

Coke0-calorie-can-pic.png
Zero-Calorie-Energy-bottom.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: jack action, WWGD, collinsmark and 6 others
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just that they considered a division there too difficult so they omitted it o0)
 
The miracle of Coca-Cola!
 
Who would want to buy a drink named PLACEBO.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
If I drink this, will I become a perpetual motion machine? 🤞
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jack action, nuuskur and berkeman
Haborix said:
If I drink this, will I become a perpetual motion machine? 🤞
Sorry, we are not allowed to discuss Free Energy Drinks on PF.

Unless the discussion is about free drinks or something... :wink:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave, Keith_McClary, hutchphd and 4 others
It’s bad marketing, as they just as easily could have branded the energy it provides as 100% green and renewable
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
The GMO-free is also missing.
Suspicious. I've seen that even on water bottles.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, 256bits and BWV
  • #10
Shouldn't it technically be about ##1.27\times 10^{16}## calories?
 
  • #11
BWV said:
It’s bad marketing, as they just as easily could have branded the energy it provides as 100% green and renewable
Yeah
Green Energy Drink
 
  • #12
Rive said:
The GMO-free is also missing.
Suspicious. I've seen that even on water bottles.
Don't forget, "no gluten."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #13
They could call it the worlds finest ginger beer too if they wanted.
 
  • #14
I only drink fat-free water!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
  • #15
I only drink transparent water :cool: (NOT dest-water, don't even try :D )

Pop science and marketing might mix very well. I've thought about this a bit and came to the conclusion that scientists are often too modest (and this is preferable) for marketing, whereas in marketing things need to be embellished, which again isn't necessarily a bad thing, but the two don't mix that well imho.

So, if you put zero cals on your soda can, that will, by default, contribute to more sales of the (god-awful digusting stomach-turning) product.

As far as embellishments go, the less there are, the better, in my experience. For example, there's a native producer for all sorts of hygiene related things: shampoos, conditioners, soaps, lotions etc etc. These are more expensive than the widely known counterparts, but the package design is laid back and not littered with all sorts of embellishments. And people still buy them. So, if you have a good product, you don't need to make it shiny.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K