Marketing and science don't always mix

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the marketing strategies of Coca-Cola, particularly in relation to its "Energy drink" branding and the scientific implications of such marketing claims. Participants explore the intersection of marketing and science, questioning the accuracy and implications of labeling products with terms like "zero calories" and the absence of certain claims like "GMO-free." The conversation touches on consumer perceptions and the role of embellishment in marketing.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether Coca-Cola considered scientific accuracy when branding their "Energy drink," particularly regarding the concept of zero calories.
  • There are humorous suggestions about the drink's effects, such as becoming a perpetual motion machine, highlighting skepticism about the product's claims.
  • Concerns are raised about the marketing being misleading, with suggestions that the energy could be branded as "100% green and renewable."
  • Participants note the absence of claims like "GMO-free" and "no gluten," expressing suspicion about the marketing choices.
  • One participant argues that scientists' modesty contrasts with marketing's tendency to embellish, suggesting that this creates a disconnect between the two fields.
  • There are comments on consumer behavior, suggesting that good products do not need excessive embellishment to sell.
  • Some participants humorously critique the idea of paying high prices for products like pristine water or sea salt, drawing parallels to the marketing of Coca-Cola's drink.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the effectiveness and ethics of Coca-Cola's marketing strategies, with no clear consensus on whether the marketing is justified or misleading. Multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between science and marketing.

Contextual Notes

Participants' claims depend on personal perceptions and assumptions about marketing practices and consumer behavior. The discussion does not resolve the implications of scientific accuracy in marketing claims.

scottdave
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
2,009
Reaction score
974
Do you think Coke was thinking science when naming this "Energy drink" ??
Do they know how much energy zero calories represents?

Coke0-calorie-can-pic.png
Zero-Calorie-Energy-bottom.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: jack action, WWGD, collinsmark and 6 others
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just that they considered a division there too difficult so they omitted it o0)
 
The miracle of Coca-Cola!
 
Who would want to buy a drink named PLACEBO.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
If I drink this, will I become a perpetual motion machine? 🤞
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jack action, nuuskur and berkeman
Haborix said:
If I drink this, will I become a perpetual motion machine? 🤞
Sorry, we are not allowed to discuss Free Energy Drinks on PF.

Unless the discussion is about free drinks or something... :wink:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave, Keith_McClary, hutchphd and 4 others
It’s bad marketing, as they just as easily could have branded the energy it provides as 100% green and renewable
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
The GMO-free is also missing.
Suspicious. I've seen that even on water bottles.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, 256bits and BWV
  • #10
Shouldn't it technically be about ##1.27\times 10^{16}## calories?
 
  • #11
BWV said:
It’s bad marketing, as they just as easily could have branded the energy it provides as 100% green and renewable
Yeah
Green Energy Drink
 
  • #12
Rive said:
The GMO-free is also missing.
Suspicious. I've seen that even on water bottles.
Don't forget, "no gluten."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #13
They could call it the worlds finest ginger beer too if they wanted.
 
  • #14
I only drink fat-free water!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur
  • #15
I only drink transparent water :cool: (NOT dest-water, don't even try :D )

Pop science and marketing might mix very well. I've thought about this a bit and came to the conclusion that scientists are often too modest (and this is preferable) for marketing, whereas in marketing things need to be embellished, which again isn't necessarily a bad thing, but the two don't mix that well imho.

So, if you put zero cals on your soda can, that will, by default, contribute to more sales of the (god-awful digusting stomach-turning) product.

As far as embellishments go, the less there are, the better, in my experience. For example, there's a native producer for all sorts of hygiene related things: shampoos, conditioners, soaps, lotions etc etc. These are more expensive than the widely known counterparts, but the package design is laid back and not littered with all sorts of embellishments. And people still buy them. So, if you have a good product, you don't need to make it shiny.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K