- 2,009
- 974
Do you think Coke was thinking science when naming this "Energy drink" ??
Do they know how much energy zero calories represents?
Do they know how much energy zero calories represents?
The discussion revolves around the marketing strategies of Coca-Cola, particularly in relation to its "Energy drink" branding and the scientific implications of such marketing claims. Participants explore the intersection of marketing and science, questioning the accuracy and implications of labeling products with terms like "zero calories" and the absence of certain claims like "GMO-free." The conversation touches on consumer perceptions and the role of embellishment in marketing.
Participants express a range of opinions on the effectiveness and ethics of Coca-Cola's marketing strategies, with no clear consensus on whether the marketing is justified or misleading. Multiple competing views remain regarding the relationship between science and marketing.
Participants' claims depend on personal perceptions and assumptions about marketing practices and consumer behavior. The discussion does not resolve the implications of scientific accuracy in marketing claims.

Sorry, we are not allowed to discuss Free Energy Drinks on PF.Haborix said:If I drink this, will I become a perpetual motion machine?![]()
YeahBWV said:It’s bad marketing, as they just as easily could have branded the energy it provides as 100% green and renewable
Don't forget, "no gluten."Rive said:The GMO-free is also missing.
Suspicious. I've seen that even on water bottles.