- 2,009
- 974
Do you think Coke was thinking science when naming this "Energy drink" ??
Do they know how much energy zero calories represents?
Do they know how much energy zero calories represents?
The forum discussion critiques the marketing strategies of Coca-Cola, particularly regarding the branding of their "Energy drink" as zero calories. Participants highlight the misleading nature of such marketing, suggesting that terms like "GMO-free" and "green energy" are omitted for commercial gain. The conversation emphasizes the disconnect between scientific accuracy and marketing embellishments, arguing that effective products do not require excessive marketing hype. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that modesty in scientific representation often clashes with the aggressive tactics of marketing.
PREREQUISITESMarketing professionals, beverage industry analysts, nutritionists, and consumers interested in understanding the intersection of science and marketing in product branding.

Sorry, we are not allowed to discuss Free Energy Drinks on PF.Haborix said:If I drink this, will I become a perpetual motion machine?![]()
YeahBWV said:It’s bad marketing, as they just as easily could have branded the energy it provides as 100% green and renewable
Don't forget, "no gluten."Rive said:The GMO-free is also missing.
Suspicious. I've seen that even on water bottles.