Mass Defect to calculate the stability of a nucleus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of mass defect and binding energy in nuclear physics, specifically in the formation of fluorine-19. It is established that the mass defect (ΔM) is negative during the formation of a nucleus, indicating that energy is released to the surroundings when the nucleus is formed. This release of energy occurs because binding energy, which is the energy required to separate nucleons, is converted from mass during the formation process. The analogy of magnets illustrates that the energy released is not additional but rather a result of the binding process itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Nuclear binding energy concepts
  • Mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Understanding of mass defect (ΔM)
  • Basic principles of nuclear forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of nuclear binding energy in detail
  • Explore mass defect calculations in various isotopes
  • Learn about the role of strong nuclear force in nucleon interactions
  • Investigate the implications of binding energy in nuclear reactions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, physicists studying atomic structure, and educators explaining nuclear binding concepts.

4everphysics
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This is just a simple conceptual question.

When we try to calculate a nuclear binding energy of some nucleus,
we get the mass defect(del M) and find the binding energy by using
(del M)c^2 right?

Well, what I do not understand is this.
For instance, let's take a formation of a flourine-19.
Flourine formation(out of neutrons and protons) would be exothermic because del M is negative, but why would energy be released to the surrounding if also the same amount of energy is being used to bind the nucleus together?

Meaning, if some (x)J amount of energy is being used as a binding energy of flourine, the mass would convert to that energy and will be thus used to bind the flourine nucleus (and if that energy is being hold onto by the nucleus as a binding energy, it should not be released to the surrounding. no?)

I hope I have phrased my question right.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Binding energy is energy required to break something apart, not to put something together. I know it sounds backwards, but it is consistent with classical picture of holding things together. If there is a force pulling two objects together, you must do work to pull them apart. Conversely, you can make them do work by letting them pull together closer. So the binding energy is released when the nucleus is formed, not absorbed.
 
So if the nucleus forms a "rope" when it is formed by converting the mass to the "rope",
why is seemingly "additional" energy released to the environment as well? when it is used up by forming the "rope"?
 
That's just not how it works. Picture two powerful magnets sticking to each other. The sound they make as they smash into each other is basically the release of the binding energy. There is nothing there that requires additional energy.
 
Magnets that snap together have opposite charge. Maybe the binding energy is the energy required to hold together like charged nucleons...
 
Look at it this way. The mass defect in a hydrogen atom is -13.6 eV, relative to a free proton and electron.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K