# Mass dialation for space drive

In summary, physicists are discussing ways to negate the conservation of momentum. One idea is to have two discs spin in opposite directions. This should work without violating any laws, as long as the discs exchange energy and angular momentum.
Question to the physicists in here:

Would it be possible to spin a metal disk such that it increases mass along the outer rim(as all objects increase mass up to infinite mass near the speed of light)? Then oscillate the disk in a tube such that it is spinning while it travels in one direction(having increased mass), stationary as it travels in the other direction(having decreased mass), so that no reaction mass is lost as in a rocket.

In theory this would negate the conservation of momentum as the disk while spinning has MORE mass than the disk while resting. The disk while spinning would only travel in one direction while the resting disk would travel in the other during it's oscillation in a tube.

Obviously the type of material, maximum rpm for the material, and relativity equations would apply.

Hope to hear from someone!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity

Last edited:
Opposite and equal reactions, remember! How will you make your disc spin in one direction without making the rocket spin in the other with the same angular momentum?

As you then push the heavier spinning mass in one direction, the heavier spinning rocket in turn will move in the other direction. The centre of gravity will not move.

Mike

I think that problem would be easily solved by having two discs of equal mass spinning in opposite directions--and moving them both up and down the tube together. But, I have no idea if this plan would work or not because of some more fundamental reason. Good thinking, though!

In theory this would negate the conservation of momentum

This should be a big red flag. If you think you've violated a conservation law, it means you've left something out.

In this case, as Mike Holland pointed out, you're leaving out how the disk gets spun up at one end and then spun down at the other. It has to exchange energy and angular momentum with *something* to do that. Include that in your scenario and you will see that overall momentum is conserved.

cephron's idea of having two disks spinning in opposite directions would take care of the angular momentum part (the net angular momentum of the two disks would be zero), but not the energy part: it takes energy to spin up the disks, and they have to give up energy to spin down. Where does that energy come from, and where does it go? Again, when you include that you'll find that the conservation laws hold up just fine. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch; sorry.

I find this concept intriguing and worth exploring further. The idea of using mass dilation for a space drive is not a new one, and there have been various proposals and theories on how to achieve it. However, it is important to note that mass dilation is a concept that is closely tied to the theory of relativity, and it is still a topic of ongoing research and debate in the scientific community.

The scenario described in the question involves spinning a metal disk in a way that increases its mass along the outer rim, while also oscillating the disk in a tube to capitalize on the different masses on either side. While this may seem like a feasible idea in theory, it is important to consider the practical limitations that may arise. As mentioned, the material and maximum rpm of the disk would play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of this concept. Additionally, the relativity equations must also be taken into account to accurately predict the behavior of the spinning disk.

Furthermore, the concept of negating the conservation of momentum is a complex one and would require further analysis and experimentation to determine its feasibility. While it is true that the spinning disk would have more mass than the resting disk, it is important to consider the overall momentum of the system, which would also include the tube and any external forces acting on it.

In conclusion, while the concept of using mass dilation for a space drive is intriguing, it would require a thorough understanding of the underlying principles and careful consideration of practical limitations before it can be deemed a viable solution. I am sure there are physicists who may have further insights and perspectives on this topic, and I look forward to hearing from them.

## 1. What is mass dilation for space drive?

Mass dilation for space drive is a theoretical concept that suggests that as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases significantly. This increase in mass makes it more difficult to accelerate the object further, which poses a challenge for space travel at high speeds.

## 2. How does mass dilation affect space travel?

Mass dilation can have a significant impact on space travel, as it requires a large amount of energy to accelerate an object with increased mass. This makes it difficult for spacecraft to reach high speeds and can also lead to time dilation, where time passes more slowly for objects moving at high speeds.

## 3. Is mass dilation for space drive a proven concept?

No, mass dilation for space drive is still a theoretical concept and has not been proven or observed in real-life scenarios. It is based on Einstein's theory of relativity and is currently being studied and explored by scientists and researchers.

## 4. Can mass dilation be used for faster-than-light travel?

While mass dilation is a fascinating concept, it cannot be used for faster-than-light travel. As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases infinitely, making it impossible to accelerate beyond that point. Therefore, faster-than-light travel is currently not possible with our current understanding of physics.

## 5. Are there any potential applications for mass dilation in space travel?

Mass dilation has been studied for potential applications in space travel, such as propulsion systems that utilize the increased mass to generate thrust. However, these concepts are still in the early stages of development and have not been proven to be feasible. Further research and experimentation are needed to determine the potential applications of mass dilation for space travel.

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
95
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K