Mass loss in common chemical reactions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of mass loss in common chemical reactions, particularly focusing on the energy released during reactions such as the formation of water from hydrogen and oxygen. Participants explore the relationship between mass and energy as described by Einstein's equation E=mc², and the implications for mass conservation in chemical processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how much mass is converted to energy in chemical reactions and whether sub-atomic particles are involved in this process, suggesting that mass-energy conservation is relevant.
  • Another participant argues that ordinary chemical reactions do not significantly change mass, asserting that mass is conserved and that any mass change is immeasurably small, despite the energy released.
  • This participant explains that binding energy is crucial to understanding mass differences, noting that the mass of a neutral atom is slightly less than the sum of its constituent protons and electrons due to binding energy considerations.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude for the explanation provided, indicating engagement with the topic.
  • Another participant questions the definition of binding energy, referencing a previous understanding that it is the difference between the mass of free neutrons and protons versus those in a nucleus, and provides a specific example involving lithium to illustrate their point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation of mass conservation in chemical reactions and the role of binding energy. There is no consensus on the definitions or implications of binding energy as discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different definitions and understandings of binding energy, indicating potential limitations in the discussion's scope and the need for precise definitions in the context of mass-energy relationships.

BarnRat
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
In any common chemical reaction that releases energy, say the reaction 2H2 + O2 = 2H2O, what mass is converted to energy via the E = MC2 equation? What sub-atomic particles are converted to energy during ordinary chemical reactions? I was taught us in HS and under-grad chemistry classes that mass is conserved in chemical reactions but I've read lately in Relativity Theory that it is mass-energy that is conserved. So, chemical reactions that release energy are converting a very small amount of mass to energy in the same, but opposite, manner that a substance warmed by sunlight is actually gaining mass.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
BarnRat said:
In any common chemical reaction that releases energy, say the reaction 2H2 + O2 = 2H2O, what mass is converted to energy via the E = MC2 equation? What sub-atomic particles are converted to energy during ordinary chemical reactions?
Your second question first: None. Ordinary chemical reactions don't do that. Ordinary chemical reactions, even a highly reactive one, barely change the mass at all. As far as chemists are concerned, mass is conserved. Unless one is extremely careful and precise in measuring mass, the change in mass is immeasurably small in chemical reactions. (There is a change; it's just very small.)

Since subatomic particles are *NOT* destroyed, what does change?

The answer lies in binding energy. It takes a good deal of energy to strip all of the electrons from an atom. The amount of energy needed is the binding energy, and it is by this quantity (divided by the speed of light squared) that that the combined mass of a bare nucleus and the freed electrons exceeds the mass of the neutral atom. For example, the mass of a neutral hydrogen atom is slightly less than the sum of the masses of a proton and an electron.

The same concept applies to chemical compounds. That binding energy released when hydrogen and oxygen ignite to form water means that water is slightly (very slightly) less massive than the constituent oxygen and hydrogen molecules.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the great answer! Much appreciated.
 
Have they changed the definition of binding energy?

I learned, many years ago that

Binding energy is the difference between the sum of the masses of neutrons and protons in the free state and the masses of the same number of neutrons and protons in a nucleus.

(Semat page 85)

Also the masses of the electrons are the same in an atom and free so cancel out.

Semat gives the folowing example: in atomic mass units

Lithium = 7.01822

4 Neutrons = 4 x 1.008987 = 4.03595
3 Protons = 3 x 1.008145 = 3.02444
total = 7.06039

The difference is the binding energy of 0.04217amu which can be equated to the binding energy by Einstein's equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K