Mass moving on hoop (with hoop itself rotating)

  • Thread starter Thread starter MisterX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Rotating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass moving on a rotating hoop, with the hoop itself also in motion. The problem involves concepts from dynamics and Lagrangian mechanics, particularly focusing on the equations of motion derived from the Lagrangian formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the equations of motion using the Lagrangian approach, expressing the position and velocity of the mass in terms of angular variables. Some participants question the interpretation of the system's rotation and whether it occurs in a horizontal or vertical plane. Others suggest checking for potential errors in the derivation of the equations, particularly in the combination of terms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's work, providing feedback and raising questions about the assumptions made regarding the system's rotation. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in the derivation, and some participants are exploring the implications of these errors on the overall understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the implications of the system rotating about a vertical axis and whether this affects the potential energy term. The original poster reflects on the possibility of having omitted terms in their calculations, which may influence the resulting equations.

MisterX
Messages
758
Reaction score
71

Homework Statement


vUM7fhv.png



Homework Equations



[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial q} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{q}}[/itex]
[itex]\cos (\alpha - \beta) = cos(\alpha)cos(\beta) + sin(\alpha)sin(\beta)[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



The position of the center is
[itex] \frac{D}{2}\left(cos(\omega t)\hat{x} + sin (\omega t)\hat{y}\right)[/itex]
The vector from the center to the mass is
[itex] \frac{D}{2}\left(cos(\omega t + \phi)\hat{x} + sin (\omega t +\phi)\hat{y}\right)[/itex]
The position of the mass is the sume of these two vectors
[itex] \frac{D}{2}\left[\left(cos(\omega t) + cos(\omega t + \phi)\right)\hat{x} +\left(sin(\omega t) + sin(\omega t + \phi)\right)\hat{y}\right][/itex]
The velocity is
[itex] \frac{D}{2}\left[-\left(sin(\omega t)\omega + sin(\omega t + \phi)\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)\right)\hat{x} +\left(cos(\omega t)\omega + cos(\omega t + \phi)\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)\right)\hat{y}\right][/itex]
The velocity squared is
[itex] \frac{D^2}{4}\left[\omega^2sin^2(\omega t) +2\omega sin(\omega t)sin(\omega t + \phi)\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right) +sin^2(\omega t + \phi)\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)^2\right][/itex]
[itex] +\frac{D^2}{4}\left[\omega^2cos^2(\omega t) +2\omega cos(\omega t)cos(\omega t + \phi)\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right) +cos^2(\omega t + \phi)\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)^2\right][/itex]
[itex] =\frac{D^2}{4}\left[\omega^2 +2\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)\left[ sin(\omega t)sin(\omega t + \phi) + cos(\omega t)cos(\omega t + \phi) \right] +\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)^2\right][/itex]
[itex] \cos (\alpha - \beta) = cos(\alpha)cos(\beta) + sin(\alpha)sin(\beta)[/itex]
[itex] v^2 =\frac{D^2}{4}\left[\omega^2 +2\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)cos(\phi) +\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)^2\right][/itex]
If I set [itex]\phi = 0[/itex] and [itex]\dot{\phi} = 0[/itex], I get [itex]v^2 = D^2\omega^2[/itex], which is what I expect, since the diameter should just be rotating with angular frequency [itex]\omega[/itex] in this case.


[itex] U = mgy = mg\frac{D}{2}\left(sin(\omega t) + sin(\omega t + \phi)\right)[/itex]

[itex] \mathcal{L} =\frac{mD^2}{8}\left[\omega^2 +2\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)cos(\phi) +\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)^2\right] -mg\frac{D}{2}\left(sin(\omega t) + sin(\omega t + \phi)\right)[/itex]

[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = - \frac{mD^2}{8}2\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)sin(\phi) -mg\frac{D}{2}\cos(\omega t + \phi)[/itex]
[itex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = \frac{mD^2}{8}\left[ 2\omega cos(\phi) + 2\dot{\phi} + 2\omega \right] = \frac{mD^2}{4}\left[ \omega cos(\phi) + \dot{\phi} + \omega \right][/itex]
[itex]\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = \frac{mD^2}{4}\left[- \omega sin(\phi)\dot{\phi} + \ddot{\phi}\right][/itex]
[itex] \frac{mD^2}{4}\ddot{\phi} = - \frac{mD^2}{4}\omega\dot{\phi}sin(\phi) - mg\frac{D}{2}\cos(\omega t + \phi) [/itex]
[itex] \ddot{\phi} = -\omega\dot{\phi}sin(\phi) - \frac{2g}{D}\cos(\omega t + \phi) [/itex]
That doesn't look exactly like a simple pendulum to me. I'd appreciate some help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nicely written!

The problem says that the system rotates about a vertical axis. So, does that imply that the system rotates in a horizontal plane?

Check to see if you might have made a careless error when combining terms to get
[itex]\frac{mD^2}{4}\ddot{\phi} = - \frac{mD^2}{4}\omega\dot{\phi}sin(\phi) - mg\frac{D}{2}\cos(\omega t + \phi) [/itex]

I'm not sure the first term on the right should be there and I think you overlooked a term that should be there.
 
TSny said:
Nicely written!

The problem says that the system rotates about a vertical axis. So, does that imply that the system rotates in a horizontal plane?

Thanks for noticing this. I had interpreted the rotation as being in a vertical plane. So with a horizontal plane I may have U = 0. I also left out a term when connecting both sides of the Euler-Lagrange Equation. Part of the term I omitted cancels the "first term on the right" that you weren't sure should be there.

[itex] \mathcal{L} =\frac{mD^2}{8}\left[\omega^2 +2\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)cos(\phi) +\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)^2\right] [/itex]

[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = - \frac{mD^2}{8}2\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)sin(\phi) = - \frac{mD^2}{4}\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)sin(\phi)[/itex][itex]\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = \frac{mD^2}{8}\left[ 2\omega cos(\phi) + 2\dot{\phi} + 2\omega \right] = \frac{mD^2}{4}\left[ \omega cos(\phi) + \dot{\phi} + \omega \right][/itex]
[itex]\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = \frac{mD^2}{4}\left[- \omega sin(\phi)\dot{\phi} + \ddot{\phi}\right][/itex]

[itex]\frac{\partial\mathcal{L} }{\partial \phi} = - \frac{mD^2}{4}\omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)sin(\phi) = \frac{mD^2}{4}\left[- \omega sin(\phi)\dot{\phi} + \ddot{\phi}\right] = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}[/itex]

[itex]- \omega\left(\omega + \dot{\phi}\right)sin(\phi) = - \omega sin(\phi)\dot{\phi} + \ddot{\phi}[/itex]
[itex]- \omega^2sin(\phi) -\omega\dot{\phi} sin(\phi) = - \omega sin(\phi)\dot{\phi} + \ddot{\phi}[/itex]
The [itex]- \omega sin(\phi)\dot{\phi}[/itex] may be removed from both sides.
[itex]\ddot{\phi} + \omega^2sin(\phi) = 0[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Looks good to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K