Mass of orbiting body calculations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the mass of an orbiting body using the formula M = 4 * PI^2 * r^3 / (G * T^2). The user initially attempts to calculate the mass of the Earth but mistakenly calculates the mass of the Sun instead. Key points include the clarification that the formula is applicable for determining the mass of the central body being orbited, not the orbiting body itself. The discussion also highlights that the mass of the orbiting body cancels out in the equations, making it impossible to calculate its mass solely from its orbital parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Familiarity with Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational constant (G = 6.67E-11 N-m²/kg²)
  • Ability to perform calculations involving radius and orbital period
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the mass of a celestial body using satellite data
  • Study the implications of orbital mechanics on mass calculations
  • Explore the concept of Hot Jupiters and their orbital characteristics
  • Review the derivation of Kepler's Third Law for further insights
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students studying orbital mechanics, and anyone interested in celestial body mass calculations.

gtsinc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I am tryting to calculate the mass of an orbiting body.

I am using M = 4 * PI^2 * r^3 / ( G * T^2 )

Lets use the Earth as an example.
However I am not getting what Nasa has for answers of 5.9 E24 kg.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html


Using this calculator: http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpgravity/keplers_law_equation_mass.php

I am using a Radius of 149,600,000,000 meters
Ref: Semimajor axis (106 km) 149.60

Period of 365.25 or 365.25*24*24 = 31,557,600 seconds

G = 6.67E-11 N-m^2 / kg^2

That calculator gets 1.98 E+21 kg. Not even close to 5.9E+24
I get 1.98E+30 because I am using meters. But still not matching 5.9E+24

Can someone help with my math - not sure what is wrong.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You've made at least two mistakes. First, this formula will give you the mass of the central object being orbited around, not of the orbiting body. In this case, you are calculating the mass of the Sun, not the Earth. If the central body is much more massive than the satellite (which is the case here), the orbital parameters are independent of the mass of the satellite. You should review how that formula is derived. Second, you must have plugged in the numbers wrong. If you do it right, it will correctly give you the mass of the Sun.
 
Ok, so I did have the mass of the sun calculated correctly as 1.98 E+30 but I was thinking of the orbiting body.

It has been years since I did this math.

What formula would I use?
 
What formula would you use for what? You used the right formula to calculate the mass of the Sun. You can't calculate the mass of the Earth from the parameters of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. If you want to calculate the mass of the Earth, you need to use something orbiting the Earth. Is that your question?
 
Sorry, yes, that was my question.
I wanted to calculate the weight of an orbiting body knowing its period and radius.

So if the body in question does not have a moon how else would it be calculated?
 
If the orbiting body is small compared to the body being orbited, there is no way to calculate the mass of the orbiting body from its period and radius. Look at the equations - the mass of the orbiting body cancels out. This means that objects of different mass follow the same orbit.
 
Now I understand - thank you.

So what would prevent a large planet like Jupiter from having an orbit as small as Mercury?
 
gtsinc said:
Now I understand - thank you.

So what would prevent a large planet like Jupiter from having an orbit as small as Mercury?
I'm guessing you haven't heard of Hot Jupiters?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Jupiter
 
gtsinc said:
Now I understand - thank you.

So what would prevent a large planet like Jupiter from having an orbit as small as Mercury?

Nothing. As Bandersnatch points out, planets like this exist. Conversely, there are asteroids much smaller than Mercury in orbits like Jupiter's.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K