Masses colliding due to gravitational attraction

AI Thread Summary
When one mass is fixed, the other mass accelerates due to gravitational attraction, acquiring speed v. In a scenario where both masses can move, they share kinetic energy, resulting in each having a speed of v/√2, leading to a relative speed of √2v. The time taken to collapse a distance r is reduced by a factor of √2 when both masses are mobile. The conservation of energy in the system is maintained because the external force on the fixed mass does not act over a distance. The closing speed of two masses moving towards each other at v/√2 is indeed √2v.
jolly_math
Messages
51
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Consider two identical masses that interact only by gravitational attraction to each other. If one mass is fixed in place and the other is released from rest, then the two masses collide in time T. If both masses are released from rest, they collide in time
(A) T/4
(B) T/(2√2)
(C) T/2
(D) T/√2
(E) T
Relevant Equations
F=Gm1m2/(r^2)
KE = 1/2(mv^2)
When one mass is held fixed, the other mass acquires a speed v from gravity.
I don't understand the following explanation:
When both masses can move, they share the kinetic energy, so both have speed v/√2, so the relative speed is √2v. Hence to collapse the same distance r, the latter case will be √2 times faster, thus the time will be T/√2.

When one mass is held fixed, there an external force applied to prevent it from moving, but it is not applied over a distance - is this why energy is conserved in the system?
Why is it that when both have speed v/√2, the relative speed of both masses moving is √2v?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jolly_math said:
When one mass is held fixed, there an external force applied to prevent it from moving, but it is not applied over a distance - is this why energy is conserved in the system?
Why is it that when both have speed v/√2, the relative speed of both masses moving is √2v?
Yes, that's the basis of the argument. You can formalise it by integrating the force by ##dr## in both cases to derive the same PE for both systems. Hence the same KE at each separation.
 
jolly_math said:
Why is it that when both have speed v/√2, the relative speed of both masses moving is √2v?
If each is moving at speed v/√2 towards the other then their closing speed is twice that, v√2.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top