Master the Exponential Equation: Solving for Y Made Easy!

  • Thread starter Thread starter GodOfYou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Stuck
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving an exponential equation, specifically 32y+3 = 3y+5, with a focus on isolating the variable y. Participants are exploring the steps necessary to manipulate the equation correctly.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of rearranging terms to isolate y, with some questioning the equivalence of different forms of the equation. There is also confusion regarding the manipulation of terms and the application of algebraic principles.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the need to keep the equation balanced while moving terms. Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, and there is a recognition of the need for clarity in the steps taken. Multiple interpretations of the equation are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the correct manipulation of the equation, and some participants are attempting to clarify the algebraic rules involved. The original poster expresses difficulty in arriving at the solution.

GodOfYou
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Exponential Equation! -Stuck!-

1. 32y+3 = 3y+5


The Attempt at a Solution



2y + 3 = y+5
2y = y+2


I really don't think I am doing this right, I am trying to find the value of Y. the answer is 2 but I don't know how to come up with the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The progress looks great to me! The next step is to get all of the y-terms on one side of the equation. :smile:
 


So then would it be 2y + y = 2 or 2y2 = 2?
 


GodOfYou said:
2y + y = 2 or 2y2 = 2

These two equations are not equivalent. Let us ignore the 2y2 = 2 for now. Your previous step left the equation at 2y = y + 2. Remember that if you add or subtract a value from one side of the equation, you have to do the same thing to the other side. Therefore, in the first equation in the quote you have 2y + y = 2, but this is not the same as 2y = y + 2 because you added one y to the left side but subtracted the y from the right side. If you add y to the left, then you must add y to the right, getting 2y + y = y + y + 2.

Instead of this, can you think of what to do to both sides of the equation that would result in having no y on the right side of the equation?
 


If b^x=b^y, then x=y

Remove b from both sides, and you're left with something quite a bit easier to solve.
 


apt403 said:
If b^x=b^y, then x=y

Remove b from both sides, and you're left with something quite a bit easier to solve.
This is good advice, but the OP has already done this. Take a closer look at the original post.
 


GodOfYou said:
So then would it be 2y + y = 2 or 2y2 = 2?
2y + y and 2y2 are very different expressions. The first is (obviously) 2y + y, which is the same as 2y + 1y; the second is 2y*y.

The distributive law says that a(b + c) = ab + ac, or equivalently, that (b + c)a = ba + ca. This second form looks a lot like 2y + 1y.
 


Mark44 said:
This is good advice, but the OP has already done this. Take a closer look at the original post.

Ahh, sorry about that. I should have looked at the solution attempt more closely.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K