Mastering Basic Bra-Ket Algebra: Tips and Techniques for Solving Problems

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jrand26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Bra-ket
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on mastering bra-ket algebra, specifically the manipulation of quantum states using the operators Sx and Sz. The participants clarify the process of expanding expressions involving outer products of bras and kets, leading to the conclusion that the expression (|z_+\rangle + |z_-\rangle)(|z_+\rangle - |z_-\rangle) simplifies to zero. Key insights include the importance of converting kets to bras when necessary and recognizing the cancellation of terms in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics terminology, particularly bra-ket notation
  • Familiarity with quantum operators such as Sx and Sz
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra and matrix multiplication
  • Experience with outer products and their implications in quantum states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quantum operators, focusing on Sx and Sz
  • Learn about the significance of outer products in quantum mechanics
  • Explore matrix representations of quantum states and operators
  • Practice problems involving bra-ket algebra to solidify understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with quantum states, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of bra-ket algebra and its applications in quantum theory.

jrand26
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm having some trouble with bra-ket algebra.

For example, our lecturer did on the board, <Sx+|Sz|Sx+>

So what I would do is, ignoring any factors of 1/sqrt(2) or 1/2 or hbar.

Sx+ = |+> + |->
Sz = |+><+|-|-><-|

=> ( |+> + |-> )(|+><+|-|-><-|)( |+> + |->)

This is where I get stuck, the lecturer goes straight from this to,

(<+| + <-|)(|+> - |->)

When I try to expand it out, for the first two terms, I get stuck at

|+> * |+><+|-|-><-| = |+>|+> <+|-|-> <-|+> ??

I can see that the |+> can go with the <-| at the end, but does it go onto the expectation as well? How does that work?

Does |+> <+|-|-> = <+|+>|-|-> ?

That doesn't look right to me. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to change your notation slightly to make it a little easier on the eyes (all the +'s and -'s inside the bras/kets get hard to distinguish from normal addition and subtraction.) We have:

|x_+\rangle = |z_+ \rangle + |z_- \rangle\\<br /> S_z = |z_+\rangle\langle z_+ | - |z_-\rangle\langle z_-|\\<br /> \langle x_+|S_z|x_+\rangle = (\langle z_+ | + \langle z_- |)(|z_+\rangle\langle z_+ | - |z_-\rangle\langle z_-|)(|z_+\rangle + |z_-\rangle)

Note the difference between my third line and yours--in the first term, the kets have to become bras, because we're putting the x_+ into a bra. I think this may be the source of some of your confusion.

To crack this, focus just on the last two terms, i.e. S_z|x+\rangle. We have:

(|z_+\rangle\langle z_+ | - |z_-\rangle\langle z_-|)(|z_+\rangle + |z_-\rangle)\\<br /> = |z_+\rangle\langle z_+ |z_+\rangle + |z_+\rangle\langle z_+ |z_-\rangle - |z_-\rangle\langle z_-|z_+\rangle - |z_-\rangle\langle z_-|z_-\rangle\\<br /> = |z_+\rangle \cdot 1 + |z_+\rangle \cdot 0 - |z_-\rangle \cdot 0 - |z_-\rangle \cdot 1\\<br /> = |z_+\rangle - |z_-\rangle

Now just substitute that back into the full expression to get:

<br /> (\langle z_+| + \langle z_-|)(|z_+\rangle - |z_-\rangle)\\<br /> =\langle z_+|z_+\rangle - \langle z_+|z_-\rangle + \langle z_-|z_+\rangle - \langle z_-|z_-\rangle\\<br /> =\langle z_+|z_+\rangle - \langle z_-|z_-\rangle\\<br /> = 1 - 1\\<br /> = 0

Whenever you see an outer product of bras and kets like |x\rangle\langle y|, you should think of it as saying that it maps |y\rangle to |x\rangle, and maps any ket orthogonal to |y\rangle to 0. Then it just becomes a matter of finding the combinations of terms which don't cancel, and using them to build your new state.

Alternatively, thinking about this in the matrix representation can also make it easier to follow, because then the whole song and dance I just did above becomes regular old matrix multiplication.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Chopin, that helps a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K