Mastering Equation Solving: 3 Ways to Simplify Complex Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoyochan
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a set of complex equations simultaneously, specifically focusing on the equations involving variables x, y, and z in relation to time t. Participants express curiosity about the origin of these equations and note the unusual nature of identical right-hand sides in some of them. Suggestions include using matrix methods for solving the equations and emphasizing the importance of showing prior attempts to solve them for better assistance. There is also a mention of using tools like Wolfram Alpha for finding solutions. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges and methods involved in mastering complex equation solving.
yoyochan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(3*10^8 t - 19288.47)^2 = (x-18167.44)^2 + (y-38037.28)^2 + (z-433.35)^2
(3*10^8 t - 17862.46)^2 = (x-40607.42)^2 + (y-11317.32)^2 + (z-5.077)^2
(3*10^8 t - 69656.18)^2 = (x-40607.42)^2 + (y-11317.32)^2 + (z-5.077)^2
(3*10^8 t - 14143.42)^2 = (x-24729.37)^2 + (y-34126.78)^2 + (z-930.27)^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yoyochan said:
(3*10^8 t - 19288.47)^2 = (x-18167.44)^2 + (y-38037.28)^2 + (z-433.35)^2
(3*10^8 t - 17862.46)^2 = (x-40607.42)^2 + (y-11317.32)^2 + (z-5.077)^2[/color]
(3*10^8 t - 69656.18)^2 = (x-40607.42)^2 + (y-11317.32)^2 + (z-5.077)^2[/color]
(3*10^8 t - 14143.42)^2 = (x-24729.37)^2 + (y-34126.78)^2 + (z-930.27)^2
You are wanting to solve these simultaneously? Where did these come from?

Are you sure the RHS of two lines is supposed to be identical?
 
It is strange equations..
But I think you can do it by matrices ..
Can't you!
 
Maged Saeed said:
It is strange equations..
That's why I'm curious to know where they arose.

Are there any other constraints on the solutions?

But I think you can do it by matrices ..
Have you looked into this, and tried solving by any means? Others are more inclined to offer help if they can see you have at least made some attempt at solving it by your own effort.

Do you have in mind how many sig figs you would like in the answers?

If all you are interested in are the solutions, have you tried wolfram alpha?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top