Matched Asymptotic ODE Solution for ##\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0##

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving the ODE $$\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0$$ using matched asymptotic expansions, with boundary conditions of finite f(0) and f(1)=1. The initial analysis leads to two equations, with the first indicating that $$f_0=0$$, causing confusion about the next steps. Participants debate the appropriate substitutions for the inner and outer expansions, particularly regarding the transformation of variables and the timing of these transformations. There is uncertainty about whether a simple power series in epsilon is suitable, and participants seek clarity on how to distinguish between inner and outer solutions. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of matched asymptotic methods and the need for careful consideration of the expansions involved.
member 428835

Homework Statement


Solve to order ##\epsilon## $$\epsilon d_x(xd_xf)-xf=0$$ subject to ##|f(0)|<\infty## and ##f(1)=1## via matched asymptotic expansions.

Homework Equations


Nothing comes to mind.

The Attempt at a Solution


Perform a matched asymptotic analysis. In this case when I take a series expansion $$f = \sum \epsilon^nf_n$$ the governing ODE yields the following two weighted equations $$xf_0=0\\
d_xf_0 - xf_1 + xd^2_x f_0=0.
$$
Notice the first equation implies ##f_0=0##. This is where I am stuck. Any help?

For the inner part I believe an appropriate substitution is ##x=(1-y)/g(\epsilon)##, but I thought this change of coordinates was typically introduced after first making an expansion and solving for the outer part.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should this really read ##d_f## in your formula?
 
  • Like
Likes member 428835
Thanks, just fixed that!
 
One problem is that you never know whether a simple power series in epsilon is appropriate. E.g. you could transform ##y=x/\epsilon## or ##y=x/\epsilon^{1/3}##.
 
DrDu said:
One problem is that you never know whether a simple power series in epsilon is appropriate. E.g. you could transform ##y=x/\epsilon## or ##y=x/\epsilon^{1/3}##.
It's a little unclear to me, but what are you suggesting? Typically I would guess ##x=(1-y)/g(\epsilon)## and weight ##g## to balance any two terms I'd like, so something like ##g=\epsilon^n##. However, I would only do this after computing the outer part, which as I showed in post 1, isn't giving good results ##f_0=f_1=0##.

Any ideas?
 
So what is the inner and what the outer part, and what distinguishes the two that you would only transform one of them?
 
DrDu said:
So what is the inner and what the outer part, and what distinguishes the two that you would only transform one of them?
That's interesting. I suppose I'm not sure why I don't transform both. Have anything in mind?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K