Matching conditions for solutions to the Schrodinger equation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
In standard, run-of-the-mill, one-dimensional scattering problems (e.g., finite square wells), we calculate transmission and reflection amplitudes by (in part) making sure that our wave function [itex]\psi[/itex] satisfies the following conditions at discontinuities of the potential:

(1) It is continuous;

(2) Its first derivative is continuous.

But why does it need to satisfy these conditions? Which of the postulates is violated if it doesn't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's first derivative isn't always continous. Think about the bound state of a delta potential. This needs to happen because whenever there is a discontinuity in the integral over the potential, it must be balanced by a discontinuity in the first derivative of the wave function.

The wave function has to satisfy a continuity equation, which translates to conservation of momentum. This equation in one-dimensional coordinate space is [itex]\frac{d}{dt}|\psi (x,t)|^2 + \frac{d}{dx} j(x,t) = 0[/itex]
where [itex]j(x,t)=\frac{\hbar}{2im}\left( \psi^* \frac{d \psi}{dx} - \psi \frac{d \psi^*}{dx}\right)[/itex]

I would think this constaint is enough to fix the amplitudes of a given scattering potential.
 
Last edited:
Because -ih ∂ψ/∂x = pψ and -h2/2m ∂2ψ/∂x2 = (E - V)ψ

If ψ were discontinuous at a point its first derivative would be infinite, and thus the momentum would be infinite. Likewise if ∂ψ/∂x were discontinuous its second derivative would be infinite, and thus the kinetic energy (E - V) would be infinite.
 
Bill_K said:
Likewise if ∂ψ/∂x were discontinuous its second derivative would be infinite, and thus the kinetic energy (E - V) would be infinite.

But this need not be the case when we have an infinite discontinuity in the potential, right? I have in mind especially infinite potential barriers and delta functions, in which the integral over the potential has a discontinuity.
 
espen180 said:
But this need not be the case when we have an infinite discontinuity in the potential, right? I have in mind especially infinite potential barriers and delta functions, in which the integral over the potential has a discontinuity.

That is mathematically correct, and it important for solving model problems in QM. However it has no physical relevance as far as I know, since I am unaware of any infinite potential barriers or delta functions in nature.