Math Analysis & ODE Intro: MIT ODE Course?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TGV320
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between mathematical analysis and ordinary differential equations (ODE), emphasizing that they are not the same. The MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) ODE course is not a substitute for a formal analysis course, which is typically required for math majors. For physics majors, the standard sequence includes Calculus I (18.01), Calculus II (18.02), and ODE (18.03), with analysis courses focusing on rigorous proofs rather than problem-solving techniques. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding prerequisites for these courses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Calculus I (MIT 18.01)
  • Familiarity with Calculus II (MIT 18.02)
  • Basic knowledge of Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) (MIT 18.03)
  • Concepts of mathematical proofs and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review MIT OCW course 18.100A Introduction to Analysis
  • Study the syllabus for MIT ODE course 18.03 to understand prerequisites
  • Explore resources on mathematical proofs and analysis techniques
  • Investigate the differences between analysis and calculus in various educational contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics or mathematics courses, particularly those interested in self-studying MIT curricula, and educators seeking to clarify the relationship between analysis and ODE.

TGV320
Messages
40
Reaction score
26
Hello,

I am currently planning on self studying math analysis with MIT ocw courses, but I cannot find the analysis course. I have found on the web that analysis and ODE are the same thing. If I want to get a good introduction to analysis, is the MIT ODE course fit for such a use?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGV320 said:
Hello,

I am currently planning on self studying math analysis with MIT ocw courses, but I cannot find the analysis course. I have found on the web that analysis and ODE are the same thing.
They are not.
TGV320 said:
If I want to get a good introduction to analysis, is the MIT ODE course fit for such a use?

Thanks
No. They are related but ODE is normally not part of analysis. If you search "analysis + pdf" and "ODE + pdf" on Google, you will almost certainly find lecture notes which tell you the difference.

Or look at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_analysis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinary_differential_equation
for a brief overview what the two areas cover.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry for having my questions sound so silly, I am really quite lost here.

I am currently preparing to self study the same classes as MIT physics majors, at least during the first two or three years of college. Will do the best I can. Is only studying ODE at first without analysis for physics majors something that is usually done?

Thanks
 
TGV320 said:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry for having my questions sound so silly, I am really quite lost here.

I am currently preparing to self study the same classes as MIT physics majors, at least during the first two or three years of college. Will do the best I can. Is only studying ODE at first without analysis for physics majors something that is usually done?

Thanks
Analysis usually covers 3 parts: real functions, real multivariate functions, complex functions.
ODE deal with relations between derivatives of functions. Normally taken after Analysis 1 and 2.
(You need integration techniques for ODE, usually taught at school and in Analysis I. Depending on the course, you will also need basics in linear algebra for ODE systems.)

However, all are relevant for physics. Analysis is about functions and functions are everywhere in physics. ODE is (roughly, for details see the Wikipedia link) about the behavior of functions in time. But behavior in time is physics!

In analysis, you learn that ##\displaystyle{\int \dfrac{1}{x}}\,dx = \log |x| +C## and in ODE you learn to solve ##y'(x)=\dfrac{1}{x}## and what it needs to determine ##C.##

It cannot be said any shorter, and such a description lacks plenty of content. You really should at least read the first section on the Wikipedia pages, possibly in your own language.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and malawi_glenn
Different countries or languages may use different terminology here.

In my experience in the US, physics and math students usually learn calculus at the beginning of university, from courses labeled "Calculus". There are are usually three semesters: Calculus 1 & 2 covering single-variable calculus, and Calculus 3 covering multi-variable calculus. These courses are oriented towards practical use and techniques. They may include a simple introduction to differential equations.

Then come courses focusing on differential equations: Ordinary Differential Equations for single variables, and Partial Differential Equations for multiple variables.

A course labeled "Analysis" is usually intended only for math majors who have already taken the Calculus 1-3 sequence. It basically covers calculus again from a more rigorous point of view, appropriate for a mathematician, focusing on theorems and proofs. Physics majors do not normally take this course, unless they are double-majoring in physics and math, as I did when I was an undergraduate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Azerack, Delta2 and vela
We do not use the word Calculus in Germany. It is called Analysis.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and vela
fresh_42 said:
We do not use the word Calculus in Germany. It is called Analysis.
Same in sweden. Same word for analysis and calculus.
 
malawi_glenn said:
Same in sweden. Same word for analysis and calculus.
We also use calculus completely differently, and I miss the English correspondence.

A calculus is a certain framework that defines a logical environment to perform deductions (e.g. Fitch calculus) or a system to perform calculations (e.g. residue calculus). It describes a framework, not analysis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
Earlier it used to be called "kalkyl"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #10
malawi_glenn said:
Earlier it used to be called "kalkyl"
It is Kalkül here. And even Kalkül has yet a double meaning: the framework, and someone's mindset which explains his actions. Putin's Kalkül that the West would silently stand by didn't work out.

So giving it a third meaning for Analysis would definitely be confusing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
It is Kalkül here. And even Kalkül has yet a double meaning: the framework, and someone's mindset which explains his actions. Putin's Kalkül that the West would silently stand by didn't work out.

So giving it a third meaning for Analysis would definitely be confusing.
I have an analysis book showing the resemblence between Cauchy and young Putin. I read that chapter the 23rd of February this year... pretty spooky
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #12
malawi_glenn said:
I have an analysis book showing the resemblence between Cauchy and young Putin. I read that chapter the 23rd of February this year... pretty spooky
Tell me when you start Tolstoi's doorstop.
 
  • #13
fresh_42 said:
Tell me when you start Tolstoi's doorstop.
I don't read books that does not have equations and diagrams
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #14
TGV320 said:
I am currently planning on self studying math analysis with MIT ocw courses, but I cannot find the analysis course.
Searching for “analysis” on the MIT OCW website gives me

https://ocw.mit.edu/search/?q=analysis

which includes e.g. 18.100A Introduction to Analysis.

Searching for “calculus” instead gives me

https://ocw.mit.edu/search/?q=calculus

which includes e.g. 18.01 Single Variable Calculus and 18.02 Multivariable Calculus. I strongly suspect that these are what you want to study, to go along with intro physics.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
TGV320 said:
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry for having my questions sound so silly, I am really quite lost here.

I am currently preparing to self study the same classes as MIT physics majors, at least during the first two or three years of college. Will do the best I can. Is only studying ODE at first without analysis for physics majors something that is usually done?

Thanks
If you want to know what math courses undergrad physics majors at MIT take, look here: https://physics.mit.edu/academic-programs/undergrads/requirements/. All freshmen are required to take 18.01 (Calculus I) and 18.02 (Calculus II). MIT now offers different physics tracks. Physics majors planning to continue on to grad physics take "The Focused Track", which requires 18.03 (Differential Equations) and "one subject given by the Mathematics Department beyond 18.03". 18.03 is taken directly after 18.02.

Many, many moons ago when I was there, after 18.03, most physics majors who were more interested in physics than math per se then took a two-semester sequence called Advanced Calculus for Scientists and Engineers (or some variation of the theme). I see that the current offering is only a one-semester course called 18.075 Methods for Scientists and Engineers. There is an OCW version of 18.075 called Advanced Calculus for Engineers (https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-075-advanced-calculus-for-engineers-fall-2004/pages/syllabus/). I see that the textbook is one version by F.B. Hildebrand (Advanced Calculus for Applications). Hildebrand was what I used way back when.

So a course specifically on analysis is not required for physics undergrads at MIT: not decades ago, and not now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and jtbell
  • #16
CrysPhys said:
All freshmen are required to take 18.01 (Calculus I) and 18.02 (Calculus II)
Aha, that explains why I didn’t see calculus listed among the physics major requirements.
 
  • #17
ODE's and PDE's are more towards the applied side, though you can do some more purely Mathematical work on them. Function Spaces and Functional Analysis in general. You may want to
think of which aspect you prefer to focus on.
 
  • #18
If anybody cares what's happening here in Greece, we use both words.

"Analysis" is an ancient greek word which is used in modern greek as well.

The Greek word for calculus is "logismos" ("Diaforikos logismos" for differential calculus for example) and it's general meaning is as in German, it means thinking or more precisely the way of thinking. And yes "logismos" relates to logic, both are ancient Greek words.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42, malawi_glenn and jtbell
  • #19
Hello
Thanks, I shall study ODE then.
 
  • #20
As you have been advised elsewhere, if you are selecting courses from MIT OCW you need to check the prerequisites listed under the "Syllabus" section of the course home page. For instance for the ODE course https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-03-differential-equations-spring-2010/pages/syllabus/ you need https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-01-single-variable-calculus-fall-2006/, for which in turn you need only "high school algebra and trigonometry. Prior experience with calculus is helpful but not essential". This sounds like you so I would start there.

In general (and specifically at MIT), courses labelled analysis are concerned with proofs (which is what mathematicians do) rather than learning methods for solving problems (which is what physicists do).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and malawi_glenn
  • #21
Hello,
I shall study in that order then. Loads of work ahead of me.
Thanks
 
  • #22
TGV320 said:
Hello,
I shall study in that order then. Loads of work ahead of me.
Thanks
Even though 18.02 is listed as a corequisite for 18.03, I would recommend that you follow the sequential order 18.01, 18.02, 18.03 (rather than completing 18.01 and taking 18.02 and 18.03 at the same time). Besides, since you are primarily interested in math needed for the physics curriculum, you should note that you will need 18.02 before you need 18.03 for your physics courses.
 
  • #23
CrysPhys said:
Even though 18.02 is listed as a corequisite for 18.03, I would recommend that you follow the sequential order 18.01, 18.02, 18.03 (rather than completing 18.01 and taking 18.02 and 18.03 at the same time). Besides, since you are primarily interested in math needed for the physics curriculum, you should note that you will need 18.02 before you need 18.03 for your physics courses.
Yes I think that's probably a good idea: remember these courses were designed for an American University year so three courses in series means you would take a year and a half to get to the end of ODEs. When studying independently you don't have this problem.
 
  • #24
pbuk said:
Yes I think that's probably a good idea: remember these courses were designed for an American University year so three courses in series means you would take a year and a half to get to the end of ODEs. When studying independently you don't have this problem.
Yes, but that's a mixed blessing. When attending a university, there is a calendar that regulates the pace. When studying independently unguided, it's too easy to take on too much.

At any rate, the typical physics and math schedule for physics majors at MIT would be:

First semester: 8.01 and 18.01
Second semester: 8.02 and 18.02
Third semester: 8.03 and 18.03
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pbuk
  • #25
Thanks, I've heard that MIT students had usually 4 main classes per term, quite a heavy load for sure.
 
  • #26
fresh_42 said:
We do not use the word Calculus in Germany. It is called Analysis.
I'd say in the usual German university-physics curriculum the equivalent of "calculus" are lectures usually called "Mathematische Methoden der Physik". At my university (Goethe University Frankfurt) we have "Mathematische Methoden" accompanying the early theoretical-physics course lectures (mechanics, electrodynamics, quantum mechanics 1). They provide a more applied approach to mathematics, usually not giving mathematically rigorous proofs but rather calculational techniques needing to solve problems in physics.

Analysis is usually taught by mathematicians and give rigorous proofs and all that. In some universities the physicists take the same lectures as the pure mathematics students in some there are extra lecture for physicists and other STEM students.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and malawi_glenn
  • #27
vanhees71 said:
I'd say in the usual German university-physics curriculum the equivalent of "calculus" are lectures usually called "Mathematische Methoden der Physik". At my university (Goethe University Frankfurt) we have "Mathematische Methoden" accompanying the early theoretical-physics course lectures (mechanics, electrodynamics, quantum mechanics 1). They provide a more applied approach to mathematics, usually not giving mathematically rigorous proofs but rather calculational techniques needing to solve problems in physics.

Analysis is usually taught by mathematicians and give rigorous proofs and all that. In some universities the physicists take the same lectures as the pure mathematics students in some there are extra lecture for physicists and other STEM students.
I don't remember how it was when I studied. Physicists and mathematicians could easily study the same first-year content. I remember the one who taught experimental physics and some of us (mathematicians) attended the course just for the show. The professor was a real entertainer.

Nevertheless, Calculus is an American word and we do not use it in German. Whether you call it analysis or methods for physicists doesn't matter, it is never 'Kalkül' which has a completely different meaning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
  • #28
This is quite interesting. Here is apparently the original German title of Courant's famous book, (which is titled Differential and Integral Calculus, in English, omitting "Lectures on"):

Vorlesungen über Differential- und Integralrechnung.

Apparently, perhaps the German speakers will tell us, "rechnung" or "Rechnung" has a meaning like computation, reckoning, or calculation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #29
mathwonk said:
This is quite interesting. Here is apparently the original German title of Courant's famous book, (which is titled Differential and Integral Calculus, in English, omitting "Lectures on"):

Vorlesungen über Differential- und Integralrechnung.

Apparently, perhaps the German speakers will tell us, "rechnung" has a meaning like computation, reckoning, or calculation.
I don't really know the difference between computation and calculation.
Vorlesung = lecture
-rechnung = calculus
Rechnung = calculation, or bill, it depends
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and mathwonk
  • #30
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K