Math Help: Prove SUM(r=1 to n) 1/r(r + 1)(r + 2)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the summation formula SUM(r=1 to n) 1/r(r + 1)(r + 2) = 1/4 - 1/2(n + 1)(n + 2) using mathematical induction. Participants express challenges with understanding the induction process and the algebra involved in the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • James expresses confusion about mathematical induction and its application to the given summation problem.
  • One participant suggests starting by proving the base case for n=1 and then assuming the statement is true for n=k to prove it for n=k+1.
  • James struggles with algebraic manipulation and seeks clarification on how to combine fractions correctly.
  • Another participant points out the importance of common denominators in the algebraic steps and corrects James on a miswritten term.
  • James shares his working steps and seeks validation, while others provide feedback and corrections on his algebra.
  • James acknowledges a mental block and expresses gratitude for the assistance received, indicating a gradual understanding of the proof process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps involved in mathematical induction but express differing levels of understanding and clarity regarding the algebraic manipulation required for the proof. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of a definitive solution, as participants continue to refine their approaches.

Contextual Notes

James's understanding of mathematical induction is limited, and he expresses difficulty with the algebraic aspects of the proof. The discussion includes various attempts to clarify these concepts without reaching a consensus on the final proof structure.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students struggling with mathematical induction, particularly in the context of summation proofs and algebraic manipulation.

james.farrow
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi this is my first post so here goes...

Basically I'm studying maths and in a section called proof and resoning they have introduced mathematical induction. I have tried to follow the examples but I still can't make head nor tail of it really. It makes absolutely no sense to me at all?

The question asked is

Prove SUM(r=1 to n) 1/r(r + 1)(r + 2) is 1/4 - 1/2(n + 1)(n + 2)


Ok where/how do I start? This bears absolutely no resemblance to any of the worked examples at all, the examples are summing squares and cubes but this is a fraction?
Can you see my problem? If I'm absolutely honest I have been on with it for a few days now (yes I said days!) and am about to forget the whole induction thing completely...


Please if anyone can help me have a light bulb moment I will be very grateful!

Many thanks


James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
james.farrow said:
Hi this is my first post so here goes...

Basically I'm studying maths and in a section called proof and resoning they have introduced mathematical induction. I have tried to follow the examples but I still can't make head nor tail of it really. It makes absolutely no sense to me at all?

The question asked is

Prove SUM(r=1 to n) 1/r(r + 1)(r + 2) is 1/4 - 1/2(n + 1)(n + 2)


Ok where/how do I start? This bears absolutely no resemblance to any of the worked examples at all, the examples are summing squares and cubes but this is a fraction?
Can you see my problem? If I'm absolutely honest I have been on with it for a few days now (yes I said days!) and am about to forget the whole induction thing completely...


Please if anyone can help me have a light bulb moment I will be very grateful!

Many thanks


James

A nice thing about induction is that you always start the same way: show that the statement is true for n= 1. For n= 1, the left hand side is just the one term 1/(1(1+1)(1+2))= 1/6 while the right hand side is 1/4- 1/(2(1+1)(1+2))= 1/4- 1/12= 3/12- 1/12= 2/12= 1/6. Yes, the statement is true when n= 1.

And, the second part is basically always the same: Assume the statement is true for n=k and prove that it must be true for n= k+1.

What you WANT to show, then is the statement with n= k+1:
\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} \frac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)}= \frac{1}{4}- \frac{1}{2(n+1)(n+2)}

Okay, the left side is just the previous sum with one new term:
\sum_{r=1}^{k}\frac{1}{r(r+1)(r+2)}+ \frac{1}{(k+1)(k+1+1)(k+2+1)}

Assuming that the formula is correct for n= k, that is the same as
\frac{1}{2(k+1)(k+2)}+ \frac{1}{(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)}

Now, do the algebra. Get common denominators and add the fractions, then show that what you get is the same as I said above.
 
Thanks for the reply! Well to be honest what you have said has meant more to me than the past few days have!
When I get home I will try and work through it as you have said - and report back...


Thanks again.

James
 
I've tried but failed again. I can't get

1/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 1/(k + 1)(K + 2)(k + 3)

to be

1/2(n + 1)(n + 2)
 
No it should be 1/(2*(n + 2)(n+3))...
 
As you can see I'm finding this very difficult to understand.
Can you tell me in 'idiot speak'? So I can try and get a grip of it...
 
Which part are you not understanding. Do you understand the concepts of MI? Are you having more trouble manipulating the equation with the Algebra?
 
james.farrow said:
I've tried but failed again. I can't get

1/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 1/(k + 1)(K + 2)(k + 3)


to be

1/2(n + 1)(n + 2)

That's 1/4- 1/(2k(k+1)(K+2)+ 1/[(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]

The "1/4" you can just leave but that "-" is important!
 
To be honest I am having trouble undrstanding MI from top to bottom - the whole 9 yards basically!
If its not too much hassle I would like a 'walk through' of it if at all possible...

Thanks for your help so far

James
 
  • #10
Are you capable of basic algebra?

What is 1/4- 1/(2k(k+1)(K+2)+ 1/[(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]?

Watching me do for you wouldn't help you any more than my watching you do 30 pushups would help me!
 
  • #11
lol yeah I can do basic algebra! Please forgive me, I'm studying through the OU and this has just been introduced. I have previously done Further Pure. Personally I don't think that the 'concept' of what we are trying to do/achieve has not been explained very well. Bear in mind this 'technique' is new to me and I've had a mental block on this for a few days now. Once the light bulb comes on and I understand what is wanted and what to do and how to apply it to various 'situations' all will be well.

Thanks

James
 
  • #12
The best way to get ouot of that "mental block" is to do the algebra that I have suggested twice now: what is 1/4- 1/(2k(k+1)(K+2)+ 1/[(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]?
 
  • #13
What am I supposed to end up with after doing the algebra?

1/4 - 1/2(k + 1)(k +2) ...?
 
  • #14
Thanks for all the help so far - it is appreciated! I don't want to jump the gun but I think the penny may have dropped...
Can someone please check my working?

We have

1/4 - 1/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 1/)k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3)

1/4 - 1/4*4/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 1/4*4/(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3)

1/4{ 1/1 - 4/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 4/(k + 1)(k + 2)(k +3) }

1/4{ (2k(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) -4(k + 3) + 4(2k))/2k(k + 1)(K + 2)(k + 3)}

1/4{ 2k^4 + 12k^3 + 22k^2 + 8k -12/2k(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) }

now divide the numerator by (k + 3) to arrive at

1/4{ (k + 3)( 2k^3 + 6k^2 + 4k -4)/2k(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) }

Cancel the (k +3) top and bottom

Take k out of the top

1/4{ k(2k^2 + 6k + 4) -4 / 2k(k + 1)(k + 2) }

1/4{ k(2k^2 + 6k + 4)/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) - 4/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) }

1/4 { 2K^2 + 6k + 4/ 2(K + 1)(k + 2) - 2/k(k + 1)(k + 2) }

1/4 { 1 - 2 / k(k + 1)(k +2) }

1/4 - 1/ 2k(k + 1)(k +2 )

Finally end up with what was asked?

Many Thanks

James
 
  • #15
james.farrow said:
Thanks for all the help so far - it is appreciated! I don't want to jump the gun but I think the penny may have dropped...
Can someone please check my working?

We have

1/4 - 1/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 1/)k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3)
The second fraction does not have a "k" in the denominator, it is just -1/[2(k+1)(k+2)]. That's my fault, I copied it wrong myself.

1/4 - 1/4*4/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 1/4*4/(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3)

1/4{ 1/1 - 4/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) + 4/(k + 1)(k + 2)(k +3) }

1/4{ (2k(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) -4(k + 3) + 4(2k))/2k(k + 1)(K + 2)(k + 3)}

1/4{ 2k^4 + 12k^3 + 22k^2 + 8k -12/2k(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) }
I don't know why you have incorporated the "1/4" in that- it just "goes along for the ride" and, as I said before, you can just leave it.
To combine -1/[2(k+1)(k+2)+ 1/(k+1)(k+2)(k+3) you need a common denominator of 2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3). That means that you need to multiply numerator and denominator of the first fraction by k+3 and of the second fraction by 2:
-(k+3)/[2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]+ 2/[2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]= (-k- 3+ 2)/[2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]= (-k-1)/[2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]= -(k+1)/[2(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)]= -1/[2(k+2)(k+3)] so, putting the 1/4 back in
that is 1/4- 1/[2(k+2)(k+3)].

Can you see that that is the same as the orginal formula with n replaced by k+1?

now divide the numerator by (k + 3) to arrive at

1/4{ (k + 3)( 2k^3 + 6k^2 + 4k -4)/2k(k + 1)(k + 2)(k + 3) }

Cancel the (k +3) top and bottom

Take k out of the top

1/4{ k(2k^2 + 6k + 4) -4 / 2k(k + 1)(k + 2) }

1/4{ k(2k^2 + 6k + 4)/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) - 4/2k(k + 1)(k + 2) }

1/4 { 2K^2 + 6k + 4/ 2(K + 1)(k + 2) - 2/k(k + 1)(k + 2) }

1/4 { 1 - 2 / k(k + 1)(k +2) }

1/4 - 1/ 2k(k + 1)(k +2 )

Finally end up with what was asked?

Many Thanks

James
 
  • #16
Thanks to all for your help - I've finally managed to understand what is being asked.
Now that I can see it is simple really, just that mental block!
It is easy without the additional 'k' lol

Thanks again

James

P.S A very useful forum, no doubt I will be posting time and again...
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K