Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around tools for writing math and physics equations in word processing documents, specifically focusing on options compatible with WordPerfect Office and alternatives like LaTeX, MathType, and Microsoft Office's Equation Editor. Participants explore various software solutions and their usability for different users.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest using MathType as a tool for writing equations, noting its integration with various office suites.
- Others mention that Microsoft Office and Open Office come with built-in equation editors, but express concerns about their quality.
- A participant highlights the challenges of using LaTeX, particularly regarding the need for co-authors to have the necessary software to view and edit documents.
- Some argue that while LaTeX is powerful, it may be difficult for users unfamiliar with it, and they propose alternatives like Latex2rtf for converting LaTeX documents.
- There are mentions of free GNU alternatives for math typesetting, but participants note these may lack features or ease of use compared to commercial options.
- One participant points out that MathType is a professional tool, while the versions bundled with office suites are limited in functionality.
- Some participants share links to online LaTeX editors that allow users to generate equations and export them as images for use in documents.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions on the best tools for writing equations, with no clear consensus on a single preferred solution. Disagreements arise regarding the usability of LaTeX and the effectiveness of various equation editors.
Contextual Notes
Some participants mention limitations in the functionality of free tools compared to commercial software, as well as potential issues with compatibility and viewing formats across different software versions.