Math Problem: Find # of Elements in 2nd/3rd Subsets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The math problem involves a set of 200 elements partitioned into three subsets, where the second and third subsets have equal cardinality. The relationship between the subsets is defined by the equations A + 2B = 200 and 4B = 3A, leading to the conclusion that the cardinality of the second and third subsets combined is 120. The confusion arises from interpreting the question, which asks for the total number of elements in either the second or third subset, thus requiring the multiplication of the cardinality of one subset (60) by 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and cardinality
  • Ability to solve linear equations
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of partitioning sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study set theory fundamentals
  • Practice solving linear equations with multiple variables
  • Explore problems involving partitioning of sets
  • Learn about cardinality and its applications in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for math exams, educators teaching set theory, and anyone interested in algebraic problem-solving techniques.

elimeli
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am practicing for my math exam next week and I came across this problem:

A set has 200 elements in it. It is partitioned into three subsets so that the second and third subsets have the same number of elements. If four times the number of elements in the second subset is three times as many as in the first, how many elements are in either the second or third subset?

The answer is 120, but I don't understand how to get to that answer.

I equaled 4 nx(2) = 3 nx(1), and so I got that 4nx(2)/3 = nx(1). I then plugged that into 200 = nx(2) + nx(2) + 4nx(2)/3 and got that nx(2)=60. The answer is 120, so I would have to multiply my answer by 2 to get it and I do not understand why, since the answer is asking for either the second or third subset and not the addition of the two.

Can anybody explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would let $A$ be the cardinality of the first subset, and $B$ be the cardinality of the second and third subsets, so that we have:

$$A+2B=200$$

$$4B=3A\implies A=\frac{4}{3}B$$

Substituting for $A$ into the first equation we get:

$$\frac{4}{3}B+2B=200$$

Multiply through by $$\frac{3}{2}$$:

$$2B+3B=300$$

$$5B=300$$

$$B=60$$

Thus, the cardinality of the union of the second and third subsets is:

$$2B=120$$
 
MarkFL said:
I would let $A$ be the cardinality of the first subset, and $B$ be the cardinality of the second and third subsets, so that we have:

$$A+2B=200$$

$$4B=3A\implies A=\frac{4}{3}B$$

Substituting for $A$ into the first equation we get:

$$\frac{4}{3}B+2B=200$$

Multiply through by $$\frac{3}{2}$$:

$$2B+3B=300$$

$$5B=300$$

$$B=60$$

Thus, the cardinality of the union of the second and third subsets is:

$$2B=120$$

But why is the answer the union of the second and third subsets if the question is asking for either one of them? Shouldn't it be 60? Or am I misinterpreting the question?
 
The question asks how many elements are in either the second or third subsets, so they are asking for the total number of elements in the union of the two subsets. If an element is in either the second or third subset, then it is to be counted. :)
 
MarkFL said:
The question asks how many elements are in either the second or third subsets, so they are asking for the total number of elements in the union of the two subsets. If an element is in either the second or third subset, then it is to be counted. :)

I see. Thank you so much for clarifying!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
944
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K