MHB Math Problem: Find # of Elements in 2nd/3rd Subsets

elimeli
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am practicing for my math exam next week and I came across this problem:

A set has 200 elements in it. It is partitioned into three subsets so that the second and third subsets have the same number of elements. If four times the number of elements in the second subset is three times as many as in the first, how many elements are in either the second or third subset?

The answer is 120, but I don't understand how to get to that answer.

I equaled 4 nx(2) = 3 nx(1), and so I got that 4nx(2)/3 = nx(1). I then plugged that into 200 = nx(2) + nx(2) + 4nx(2)/3 and got that nx(2)=60. The answer is 120, so I would have to multiply my answer by 2 to get it and I do not understand why, since the answer is asking for either the second or third subset and not the addition of the two.

Can anybody explain?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let $A$ be the cardinality of the first subset, and $B$ be the cardinality of the second and third subsets, so that we have:

$$A+2B=200$$

$$4B=3A\implies A=\frac{4}{3}B$$

Substituting for $A$ into the first equation we get:

$$\frac{4}{3}B+2B=200$$

Multiply through by $$\frac{3}{2}$$:

$$2B+3B=300$$

$$5B=300$$

$$B=60$$

Thus, the cardinality of the union of the second and third subsets is:

$$2B=120$$
 
MarkFL said:
I would let $A$ be the cardinality of the first subset, and $B$ be the cardinality of the second and third subsets, so that we have:

$$A+2B=200$$

$$4B=3A\implies A=\frac{4}{3}B$$

Substituting for $A$ into the first equation we get:

$$\frac{4}{3}B+2B=200$$

Multiply through by $$\frac{3}{2}$$:

$$2B+3B=300$$

$$5B=300$$

$$B=60$$

Thus, the cardinality of the union of the second and third subsets is:

$$2B=120$$

But why is the answer the union of the second and third subsets if the question is asking for either one of them? Shouldn't it be 60? Or am I misinterpreting the question?
 
The question asks how many elements are in either the second or third subsets, so they are asking for the total number of elements in the union of the two subsets. If an element is in either the second or third subset, then it is to be counted. :)
 
MarkFL said:
The question asks how many elements are in either the second or third subsets, so they are asking for the total number of elements in the union of the two subsets. If an element is in either the second or third subset, then it is to be counted. :)

I see. Thank you so much for clarifying!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top