Mathematical studies before graduate school

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessary mathematical preparation for entering a master's program in pure mathematics, particularly focusing on analysis. Participants explore various topics and resources that may be beneficial for someone transitioning from a non-mathematics undergraduate background.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their preparation for graduate studies, specifically questioning what foundational topics are necessary beyond basic real analysis and linear algebra.
  • Another participant suggests that abstract algebra is essential and inquires about the individual's familiarity with proofs, indicating that this knowledge is crucial for graduate-level work.
  • A participant acknowledges their lack of focus but confirms an intention to pursue a master's in analysis, admitting a gap in their understanding of abstract algebra.
  • Topics such as differential geometry, partial differential equations (PDEs), measure theory, projective geometry, and probability are discussed, with varying opinions on whether they are essential for undergraduate or graduate studies.
  • One participant recommends specific topics to study, including topology, measure theory, functional analysis, and complex analysis, while suggesting that knowledge of abstract algebra is beneficial but not strictly necessary.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to explore various branches of mathematics but acknowledges time constraints, indicating a focus on the recommended topics as a reasonable goal.
  • References to specific textbooks are provided, including Munkres for topology and Aliprantis and Burkinshaw for measure theory, with a request for more information about Hille's book on complex analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of certain foundational topics like topology and measure theory, but there is no consensus on the necessity of other subjects such as differential geometry and probability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the breadth of knowledge required before entering graduate studies.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with mathematical proofs and specific topics, indicating a range of backgrounds and preparation levels. The discussion highlights the subjective nature of what constitutes essential knowledge for graduate studies in mathematics.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals preparing for graduate studies in mathematics, particularly those transitioning from non-mathematics undergraduate programs, may find this discussion relevant.

Desordre
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Dear fellows,
my undergrad was not in maths, but I have quite a chance of getting into a master's program in pure maths, later this year. Long story, not particularly interesting.

My question is due to the fact that I am quite prepared to the examination (basic real analysis and linear algebra), but I don't think they do reflect an adequate undergraduate formation. So, I'd like to ask you: what do you think it is necessary to accomplish before graduate studies?

If you feel like recommending some bibliography, it would be very nice!
Desordre.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you want to do in grad school exactly?? Something analysis related?? Algebra?? Our answer will depend on this.

In any case, you're missing abstract algebra, which I feel is very necessary.

Do you have any familiarity with proofs?? (I don't know how rigorous the linear algebra/basis analysis was). If not, you're going to need that.

I can probably give a better answer if you give us some more information.
 
Dear Micromass,
thanks for you answer. I have not a precise focus already (because, up to a certain point, it does not depend on me), but my master's will be in analysis for sure.

About abstract algebra, it is a hole in my background indeed. I know some group theory, but I need to develop this area. Proofs are something I am working right now. Tough self taught, my studies of analysis and linear algebra were rigorous, based on Spivak, Bartle, Rudin (analysis) and Strang, some Halmos (linear algebra). Nevertheless, I think I can improve my demonstrations, specially when I consider the formal situation of an exam.

My main concern are the disciplines I feel that lie on the threshold: differential geometry, PDEs, measure theory are undergraduate or graduate matters? And what about projective geometry, probability, further topics on algebra: are not those topics "cultural" from my point of view?


Ds.
 
OK, that's good. If you went through Spivak and Rudin, then I think you're familiar enough with proofs.

Since you want to do a masters in analysis, I think the following topics are necessary (roughly in order that you should do them):
1) Topology. Munkres is a good book.
2) Measure theory. "Principles of Real analysis" by Aliprantis and Burkinshaw is good.
3) Functional analysis. If you can handle it, then you should go through "Real Analysis" by Lang.
4) Complex Analysis. Hille's book is quite ok.

As for mathematical culture. I feel that one should be acquainted with a bit of abstract algebra. Basic stuff like groups, rings and modules should be known.

As for other topics, like probability, projective geometry and differential geometry, I feel that those aren't really necessary. It would be nice to know them, but it's better to focus on other things now.
 
Dear micromass,
you brought a smile to my face. Of course I'd like to explore many branches of mathematics, and learn interesting stuff, but who has the time?!? These four topics are a reasonable goal, and are indeed an expansion from my current state of knowledge. I'm not acquainted with Hille's book: would you mind to give me the reference?
Thanks again!
Ds.
 
Desordre said:
Dear micromass,
you brought a smile to my face. Of course I'd like to explore many branches of mathematics, and learn interesting stuff, but who has the time?!? These four topics are a reasonable goal, and are indeed an expansion from my current state of knowledge. I'm not acquainted with Hille's book: would you mind to give me the reference?
Thanks again!
Ds.

Oh, sorry. I mean this book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0828402698/?tag=pfamazon01-20
There are many other good books on complex analysis though...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K