Mathematically model airflow over an aerofoil

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisHarvey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airflow Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on mathematically modeling airflow over an aerofoil using the correct theory of lift, specifically the Turning airflow approach. Participants recommend exploring "Potential Flow Theory" and "Stream Function Theory" as foundational concepts in low-speed inviscid aerodynamics. The conversation highlights the misconception that airflow velocity parallel to the surface must remain constant, emphasizing the importance of viscosity and the complexities of airflow dynamics. For beginners, starting with simplified models, such as a flat plate or semi-circle, is advised to grasp the fundamental principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of "Potential Flow Theory"
  • Familiarity with "Stream Function Theory"
  • Basic knowledge of viscous forces in fluid dynamics
  • Ability to differentiate equations related to airflow
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Potential Flow Theory" in aerodynamics
  • Study "Stream Function Theory" for airflow modeling
  • Learn about viscous effects in fluid dynamics
  • Practice modeling airflow over simplified geometries like flat plates
USEFUL FOR

Aeronautical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in fluid dynamics and airflow modeling over aerofoils will benefit from this discussion.

ChrisHarvey
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm looking for someone who could explain how I can mathematically model airflow over an aerofoil using the "correct theory of lift" - Turning airflow.

I have tried several approaches but all fail because of one step... all textbooks I have read on the subject say that the airflow velocity parallel to the horizontal is constant. Therefore the air must accelerate over the aerofoil because velocity must change. The forces required for this to happen act on the aerofoil through the viscous forces of the air. I have however not even got this far in my model because...

Taking any equation for one surface of an aerofoil, at least two parts of it have a 0 gradient. When I differentiate this equation to get velocity, at these points I therefore have infinite velocity, which is obviously not the case.

Please can anybody guide me in the right direction as I am obviously doing something terribly wrong!?
Thanks, Chris
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Come on now, you know bloody well this isn't atomic physics.

I'm moving this to the Aeronautical Engineering Forum, where it will probably get more attention.
 


Originally posted by ChrisHarvey

I'm looking for someone who could explain how I can mathematically model airflow over an aerofoil using the "correct theory of lift" - Turning airflow.

Not exactly sure what you mean. Try looking up "Potential Flow Theory" or "Stream Function Theory", both of which are complementary (really just perpendicular to each other) theories in low speed inviscid aerodynamics.

Originally posted by ChrisHarvey

I have tried several approaches but all fail because of one step... all textbooks I have read on the subject say that the airflow velocity parallel to the horizontal is constant.

For a start, the velocity parallel to a surface need not be constant. Don't forget viscosity :wink:. The textbooks you were reading were probably (no offense) lower level aerodynamic ones or physics texts which don't deal with issues like separation or shear layers...


Originally posted by ChrisHarvey

Therefore the air must accelerate over the aerofoil because velocity must change. The forces required for this to happen act on the aerofoil through the viscous forces of the air. I have however not even got this far in my model because...

Taking any equation for one surface of an aerofoil, at least two parts of it have a 0 gradient. When I differentiate this equation to get velocity, at these points I therefore have infinite velocity, which is obviously not the case.

Please can anybody guide me in the right direction as I am obviously doing something terribly wrong!?
Thanks, Chris

See above. The maths can get quite detailed for all but the simplest geometries. At at introductory level, you are probably best off modelling your 'aerofoil' as a flat plate with a small inclination, or a semi-circle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K