Mathematics and Theory of Knowledge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the exploration of foundational principles in mathematics within the context of the Theory of Knowledge course. Peter seeks to identify a fundamental assumption that underpins mathematics, drawing parallels to the definition of 0! = 1. A key suggestion is the existence of the empty set, which is foundational in set theory, particularly under the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms. This leads to a philosophical inquiry into the nature of absolute versus relative truths in mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic mathematical concepts, including factorials.
  • Familiarity with set theory, specifically the empty set.
  • Knowledge of Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms and their significance in mathematics.
  • Basic philosophical concepts, particularly the Law of Non-Contradiction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory and its axioms.
  • Explore the implications of the empty set in mathematical logic.
  • Study the philosophical debates surrounding absolute and relative truths in mathematics.
  • Investigate the relationship between mathematical assumptions and their philosophical consequences.
USEFUL FOR

Students of philosophy, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of mathematics and their philosophical implications.

Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

As part of my Theory of Knowledge course I am studying the areas of knowledge, more specifically, Mathematics.

I am researching about the idea of absolute and relative truths. I am looking for the most basic, fundamental principle of mathematics, that is, maybe an "assumption(?)" that enables mathematics to function, analogous to the fact that 0! = 1. It is defined as so in order to make factorials work. With that idea I could then argue that, if that principle existed and was not absolute, hence, relative, Mathematics would exist and not exist at the same time, going against the Law of non-contradiction for example.

Is there such a principle?

Thanks,
Peter
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cool, thanks for the response! I will look into that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K