Mathematics to Understand other Fields of Science

Click For Summary
To effectively study electricity, magnetism, and waves/optics, a solid foundation in several branches of mathematics is essential. Key areas include calculus, particularly vector calculus, which is crucial for understanding electromagnetism. Differential equations and Fourier analysis are also important for analyzing wave phenomena. While complex analysis and group theory can be beneficial, especially in quantum mechanics and advanced topics, they are not strictly necessary for undergraduate physics. A math-methods course is recommended as it provides a broad overview of relevant mathematical concepts without the depth of traditional math courses. Overall, a deeper understanding of mathematics enhances comprehension of physics concepts, allowing for a more meaningful learning experience rather than mere memorization of formulas.
V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
Just like calculus (single as well as multi-variable) and linear algebra are not only useful but really similar to classical mechanics. What are the branches of mathematics that I need to know in order to have that same feeling of deja-vu when studying electricity/magnetism and waves/optics? I remember taking those classes in high school, but I forgot most of it.. I forgot most of mechanics as well, but now that I retook that class in college, focusing primarily on calculus, I feel like I really learned something as opposed to memorising a few of formulas and constants.
I know that calculus probably has a lot to do with both waves and electricity, but are there any other additional things I should know? Complex analysis, group theory?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A partial list: differential equations, Fourier analysis, probability theory (maybe - certainly for quantum theory)
 
For E&M specifically, vector calculus. I firmly believe that the math you understand influences the way you understand physics. You can learn a lot about physics without too much math, but the more math you learn, the better off you'll be.

Group theory probably won't help except for QM and higher level Mechanic. I'm pretty certain that you can do well in an undergrad physics program with minimal understanding of group theory or formal complex analysis.

Take a math-methods course if your school offers one. That will cover a lot of different areas of math without the rigor involved in a normal math class (by all means, take the full math classes if you can afford the time).
 
For E&M specifically, vector calculus. I firmly believe that the math you understand influences the way you understand physics. You can learn a lot about physics without too much math, but the more math you learn, the better off you'll be.

Group theory probably won't help except for QM and higher level Mechanic. I'm pretty certain that you can do well in an undergrad physics program with minimal understanding of group theory or formal complex analysis.

Take a math-methods course if your school offers one. That will cover a lot of different areas of math without the rigor involved in a normal math class (by all means, take the full math classes if you can afford the time).
 
Don't know why that posted twice. I'm going to try double clicking from now on and see if I can do it again.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K