Matrice Multiplication, can someone check my work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around matrix multiplication, specifically the multiplication of a 3x2 matrix by a 2x2 matrix. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks verification of their results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to multiply the matrices but is unsure if their method is correct. They describe their approach to calculating the products of the matrix elements. Other participants question the correctness of the multiplication process and provide a general formula for matrix multiplication.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's calculations, with one confirming that the revised answer appears correct. There is an ongoing exploration of the multiplication process, and some participants have engaged in clarifying terminology related to matrices.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of linguistic aspects regarding the terminology used for matrices, which may distract from the primary mathematical discussion. The original poster also references checking answers against a textbook, indicating a reliance on external resources for validation.

Deagonx
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Its a 3x2 multiplying a 2x2. (3 down 2 across, 3x2) I was gone for the day that my teacher explained it to us, and I am not sure how to do it. I tried, but I want to be sure.



Homework Equations


5 2
0 -4 _X_ 3 7
1 6 ___ -2 0

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer I got was
18 42
-8 0

Can one of you intellectuals tell me if I got the right answer?

EDIT: I realized I didn't actually tell you what I did. I took the first column of numbers in the first matrix (5, 0, 1), and added together the products of it and the first number in the first column (3). I took the 3 numbers from the second column (2, -4, 6) and added the products of them and the first number in the second column (7). I repeated that with the -2 and the 0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not multiplying the matrices correctly. Here is what you should do:

[itex] \left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> a & b\\ <br /> c & d\\<br /> e & f <br /> \end{array} <br /> \right) \cdot<br /> \left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> g & h\\ <br /> i & j\\<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right) =<br /> \left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> ag + bi & ah + bj\\ <br /> cg + di & ch + dj\\<br /> eg + fi & eh + fj<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right)[/itex]

You have a 3x2 (rows x columns) multiplied by a 2x2 matrix. When multiplying, the "inside" two numbers cancel out and the resulting matrix is the dimensions of the outside numbers. So, for example, a 4x3 matrix multiplied by a 3x1 matrix would yield a 4x1 matrix. The inside numbers MUST match, otherwise it's not valid to multiply them.

Try to redo your problem and see what you come up with!
 
This time I got
11 35
8 0
-9 7

Is that right?
 
The singular of the (plural) word matrices, is the word matrix.
 
That answer looks good! And what Sammy posted is also correct, I didn't catch that any of the times I glanced at the subject.
 
SammyS said:
The singular of the (plural) word matrices, is the word matrix.

And matrice is not a word. Those Romans with their Latin language and weird plurals are to blame. Some other Latin-derived words with the same pluralization rules are appendix, aviatrix (female aviator), and circatrix (scar tissue).
 
Well, linguistic debates aside, I checked in the back of the book in the selected answers, and it seems I got it right. Thanks for the help, but I have another problem so I posted another thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K