Matrices: Question about Commutativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter flash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the commutativity of matrix multiplication, specifically addressing the manipulation of scalars in matrix operations. It is confirmed that for matrices X and Y, and a scalar k, the expression X * kY can be simplified to k(X * Y) without affecting the result. The conversation also highlights the distinction between commutative and non-commutative rings, with a specific focus on quaternions, where scalar multiplication remains commutative while matrix multiplication does not. The user successfully applied this understanding to work with quaternions containing complex numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication and properties
  • Knowledge of scalar multiplication in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with quaternions and their properties
  • Basic concepts of commutative and non-commutative rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quaternion multiplication and its implications
  • Explore scalar multiplication in various algebraic structures
  • Learn about the identity matrix and its role in matrix operations
  • Investigate the differences between commutative and non-commutative algebraic systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone working with linear algebra, particularly those dealing with quaternions and matrix operations.

flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I have a question about commutativity.
I have two matrices X and Y and a constant k. I want to calculate X * kY. Can I bring k out the front to give k(X*Y)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the link. It says "When the underlying ring is commutative, for example, the real or complex number field, the two multiplications are the same. However, if the ring is not commutative, such as the quaternions, they may be different."

Lol, I am actually working with quaternions. The matrices contain complex numbers. I am trying to show that
Q * Q-1 = Identity
but Q-1 is kX because its the inverse of a 2x2 matrix. So I thought it would be easier to work out QX then multiply the answer by k to (hopefully) give the Identity matrix (if that makes any sense at all).
 
Well then, I bow to people more knowledgeable than I about manipulating quarternions.
 
Same statement is true: a scalar (number), k, can be moved around pretty much as you wish. It is only multiplication of the matrices or quaternions that is non-commutative.
 
Thanks for the help, I moved k out the front and it worked :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K