Matrix Eigenvectors: How Many Are Linearly Independent?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which a matrix has linearly independent eigenvectors, exploring the relationship between eigenvalues and eigenvectors, particularly in the context of real and complex matrices. Participants examine specific examples and the implications of distinct versus repeated eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that a real matrix may have no real eigenvectors, while every complex matrix has complex eigenvectors due to the algebraic closure of complex numbers.
  • It is proposed that distinct eigenvalues correspond to linearly independent eigenvectors, while repeated eigenvalues do not guarantee this independence.
  • A participant presents a specific 2x2 matrix and seeks clarification on the number of independent eigenvectors it possesses.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of the characteristic equation in determining eigenvalues and subsequently eigenvectors.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of distinct versus repeated eigenvalues on the independence of eigenvectors, with some arguing that distinct eigenvalues ensure independence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that distinct eigenvalues lead to linearly independent eigenvectors, but there is contention regarding the implications of repeated eigenvalues and the conditions under which independence can be assured.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the geometric and algebraic multiplicities of eigenvalues without resolving how these concepts interact in specific cases. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of eigenvalues and the structure of matrices.

saadsarfraz
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am a little confused how do you find out when a matrix has two independent eigenvectors or when it has one or when it has more than two, or is it possible it can have no eigenvectors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends what field you are working over. You can have a real matrix that has no real eigeinvectors. However, every complex (and therefore real) matrix has complex eigenvectors. This is because the complex numbers are algebraically closed (every polynomial in C has a solution in C) so that the characteristic equation necessarily has a root. Distinct eigenvalues will have linearly independent eigenvectors.

A theorem is that an eigenvalue's geometric multiplicity (the dimension of the eigenspace) is less than or equal to its algebraic multiplicity (its multiplicity in the characteristic equation). For example, if the characteristic equation is (x-1)^2(x+2) then since 1 has algebraic multiplicity 2, you know that there are at most 2 linearly independent eigenvectors with eigenvalue 1. Since -2 has multiplicity 1, there is exactly one eigenvector (up to scale).
 
If there is a 2x2 matrix for example [0,0] in the first row and [0,1] in the 2nd row? how many independent eigenvectors does it have?
 
saadsarfraz, can you write down the characteristic equation of the matrix? That is a good place to start.
 
the characteristic equation is r(r-1)=0 which gives r=0 and r=1, for r=0 i get x2=0 and for r=1 i get x1=0,i think there might be two independent eigenvectors, but i would be grateful if someone could tell me what those eigenvectors be in this case.
 
That's an easy case: if two eigenvector correspond to distinct eigenvalues, then they are independent.

Suppose [itex]Au= \lambda_1 u[/itex] and [itex]Av= \lambda_2 v[/itex] where [itex]\lambda_1\ne\lambda_2[/itex], u and v non-zero. That is, that u and v are eigenvectors of A corresponding to distinct eigenvalues. Let [itex]a_1u+ a_2v= 0[/itex]. Applying A to both sides of the equation, [itex]a_1A(u)+ a_2A(v)= 0[/itex] or [itex]a_1\lambda_1 u+ a_2\lambda_2 v= 0[/itex].

First, if [itex]\lambda_1= 0[/itex], then we have [itex]a_2\lambda_2 v= 0. Further,[itex]\lambd_2[/itex] is non- zero because the eigenvalues are distinct so it follows that [itex]a_2= 0[/itex]. If [itex]\lambda_1\ne 0[/itex], we can divide by it and get <br /> [tex]a_1u+ \frac{\lambda_2}{\lambda_1}a_2 v= 0[/tex][/itex][tex]. Since we also have that [itex]a_1u+ a_2v= 0[/itex], it follows that <br /> [tex]\frac{\lambda_2}{\lambda_1}a_2 v= a_2 v[/tex]<br /> again giving [itex]\lambda_2= 0[/itex].<br /> <br /> If two eigenvectors correspond to the <b>same</b> eigenvalue, they are not necessarily distinct.[/tex]
 
If it has distinct eigenvalues then it has linearly independent eigenvectors. However if the eigevalues are not distinct then you cannot guarantee linearly independent eigenvectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K