Matrix equation, solving for x(t)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter exidez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the matrix equation for solving x(t) from the textbook reference. The key equations involved are e^{-\textbf{A}t}x(t)-x(0) and x(t)=e^{-\textbf{A}t}x(0)+\int{e^{-\textbf{A}(t-\tau)}\textbf{Bu}(\tau)d\tau}. The participant questions the presence of e^{-\textbf{A}t} in the derived equation, suggesting that it should be e^{\textbf{A}t} instead. The correct approach involves multiplying equation (I.24) by e^{At} to eliminate the negative signs, confirming the definition of \Phi(t) as e^{At}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix exponentiation, specifically e^{At}
  • Familiarity with linear differential equations and their solutions
  • Knowledge of integral calculus as it applies to matrix equations
  • Basic concepts of control theory, particularly state-space representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix exponentials in linear systems
  • Learn about the Laplace transform and its application in solving differential equations
  • Explore the derivation and application of state-space models in control systems
  • Investigate common mistakes in matrix algebra, particularly with signs in equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those studying control systems, linear algebra, and differential equations. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of matrix equations and their applications in dynamic systems.

exidez
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
this comes strait from a textbook:
http://higheredbcs.wiley.com/legacy/college/nise/0471794759/appendices/app_i.pdf
I am looking at how they obtained (I.24) from (I.25) on page 3 and 4.

Firstly we have:

e^{-\textbf{A}t}x(t)-x(0)=\int{e^{-\textbf{A}t}\textbf{Bu}(\tau)d\tau}

Then this is derived to:

x(t)=e^{-\textbf{A}t}x(0)+\int{e^{-\textbf{A}(t-\tau)}\textbf{Bu}(\tau)d\tau}

my question is why does the derived equation have e^{-\textbf{A}t}. I thought it would have been e^{\textbf{A}t} instead. Can someone explain this too me. The text didnt help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there are typos in the first line of equation 25. Some of the minus signs shouldn't be there.

The statement "where \Phi(t) = e^{At} by definition" and the equation involving \Phi are correct.

Just take equation 24 and multiply all the term by e^{At} (note, no minus sign!) to get the correct version.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K