I Matrix form of metric component transformation?

farfromdaijoubu
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Question about the matrix form of a metric transformation from coordinate system to another.
The transformation of the metric from unprimed to primed coordinates is given in Moore's GR workbook as:
##g'_{uv} = \frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{'u}}

\frac{\partial x^b}{\partial x^{'v}}g_{ab}##

In matrix form, by matching indices on both sides (so that u and v are the outer 'indices'), I got
##(g'_{uv}) = \left(\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{'u}}\right)^T (g_{ab})


\left( \frac{\partial x^b}{\partial x^{'v}} \right)##


But on pg. 146 of Schutz's GR textbook, he writes the matrix form of the transformation as $$(g') = $(\Lambda) (g) \Lambda)^T$$, where ##\Lambda = \left(\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial x^{u'}} \right)##.

How did he get this result? Did I misunderstand something? Because I don't think it's equivalent to what I got...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Different books may have different definitions of which of the indices of ##\partial x^a/\partial x^{u’}## is to be interpreted as the row index.
 
  • Like
Likes farfromdaijoubu and Ibix
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
Back
Top