Matrix manipulation/arithmetic in equations for proofs

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dixanadu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Proofs
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around matrix manipulation and arithmetic, particularly focusing on the order of operations in matrix equations and the proof of properties related to matrix transposition and inversion. Participants explore foundational concepts and specific examples related to these topics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to rearrange the matrix equation AB-1 = C for A, asking whether it results in A = BC or A = CB, and seeks guidance on determining the correct order in general.
  • Another participant explains that to isolate A, one should multiply both sides by B from the right, leading to A = CB, emphasizing the importance of the direction of multiplication in matrix equations due to non-commutativity.
  • A third participant reiterates the need to multiply by B on the right to derive A = CB, and notes that multiplying by B on the left would not yield a simplifiable result.
  • Regarding the proof that (AT)-1 = (A-1)T, one participant points out that in the steps leading to the conclusion, both sides still equal the identity matrix, indicating that the left-hand side is indeed the inverse of AT.
  • Another participant expresses appreciation for the confirmation of their understanding, noting the similarity in responses to the initial question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of the order of operations in matrix multiplication and the steps involved in the proof of the transposition property. However, there is no explicit consensus on the clarity of the proof steps, as one participant expresses confusion about the final conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential for misunderstanding basic operations and the need for clear definitions and steps in matrix manipulation. There are references to missing assumptions or steps in the proof process that remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals new to linear algebra, particularly those seeking clarification on matrix operations, properties of transposition and inversion, and the implications of non-commutativity in matrix multiplication.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hi there again guys!

I didnt really know what to call this thread, because my problem isn't actually to do with how to manipulate the elements of the matrix itself, but rather how to deal with the actual symbol for the matrix in equations.

I'll start off with a fundamental thing, even though I'm not sure it makes sense. Suppose I have a matrix equation AB-1= C. Obviously the order matters unlike in regular algebra, so if I rearrange this for A, do i get A = BC or A = CB? how do I tell the order it needs to be in, generally?

Now I'll go onto a specific example. I need to prove that (AT)-1 = (A-1)T. My textbook makes sense until the last step. Here's what it says if I fill in some gaps:

1) Start with AA-1 = I = A-1A, where I is the identity matrix.
2) Transpose each term. So (AA-1)T = IT = (A-1A)T
3) Take AT out of the brackets: (A-1)TAT = AT(A-1)T.
4) Then it says "Clearly (A-1)T = (AT)-1"... I don't really get how that comes about, feels like it got plucked out of nowhere, unless I am missing something stupid. I think mainly my problem is that I am pretty new to this whole thing so I don't understand some basic operations. So if you guys know of some material online that maybe goes over this sort of thing, I'd love to check it out.

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AB^-1 = C

multiply each side by B from the right,

(AB^-1)B = CB

Use the identity B^-1*B = I to say A = CB.

It's important to make sure that when you multiply each side of an equation by a matrix, you multiply it from the correct direction, eg. if A = B, AC =/= CB in general. If you multiply both sides by C, the C must either go on the far left end or on the far right end. CA = CB and AC = BC. In short, matrix multiplication is non-commutative, so the order of operations matters.

Regarding the proof... in step 3, they lose the "= I =" middle section, but both LHS and RHS still equal the identitiy matrix, so what you really have is two separate expressions that both equal I (I^T = I). If you write these down and compare them to the definition of the matrix inverse, it should be exactly enough proof to show that (A^T)^-1 = (A^-1)^T
 
Dixanadu said:
I'll start off with a fundamental thing, even though I'm not sure it makes sense. Suppose I have a matrix equation AB-1= C. Obviously the order matters unlike in regular algebra, so if I rearrange this for A, do i get A = BC or A = CB? how do I tell the order it needs to be in, generally?
Remember how you get rid of B-1: You multiply both sides with B on the right side and get:
AB-1B= CB
Afterwards, you can use B-1B = I and get A=CB
If you would multiply with B on the left side, you would get BAB-1= BC, but that cannot be simplified in the same way.
No need to guess the result, you can derive it step by step.

Now I'll go onto a specific example.
In steps 3-4, remember that both sides are still equal to I. Therefore, you found a matrix which, multiplied by AT, gives I - it is the inverse of AT.
 
These two posts are almost word for word and at the same time. It's nice that someone verifies I'm not talking rubbish every now and then!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K