Matrix multiplication: index / suffix notation issues

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of using summation notation for matrix multiplication. The correct notation for multiplying matrices (AB) by C is clarified, emphasizing the need to properly substitute summations. It is confirmed that the order of summation can be swapped without affecting the results, similar to the commutative property of addition. Additionally, the importance of using correct brackets in notation is highlighted to avoid confusion between matrix products and scalar multiplications. The participant acknowledges the issues with notation and plans to ask further questions in a new thread.
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey everyone,

I'm struggling with the summation notation for matrices and vector operations, multiplication in particular. Please refer to the image below where I've typed it all out in Word, its too cumbersome here and I want my meaning to be clear:
https://imageshack.us/scaled/large/580/indicesquestion1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ah man that image turned out tiny...If you guys need it to be bigger please let me know!
 
Your first summation for ##(AB)_{ij}## is ok.

Your notation for the next one isn't right. If you want to multiply (AB) by C, you have
$$(ABC)_{ij} = \sum_l^L (AB){}_{il}C_{lj}$$

Now plug in the summation for ##(AB)_{il}## and you get
$$(ABC)_{ij} = \sum_l^L (\sum_k^K A_{ik}B_{kl})C_{lj}$$

You got to the right formula in the end, but (as you said) not in a very logical way.
 
Okay, thank you, I still have a few more questions but for the time being, can you tell me if I can swap the sigma symbols without reordering the suffixes?
 
It doesn't matter what order you add up the terms. Changing the order is the same as saying a+b+c+d+e+f = a+d+b+e+c+f, or whatever order you like.
 
Alright. Just to make sure that I understand this properly...let's say I want to multiply 4 matrices A B C D together, where the multiplication is possible. Does it go like this:

https://imageshack.us/scaled/large/853/summationquestion.jpg

Hopefully its right T_T and now the image is too big :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's right but I would say make sure you get your brackets right. (AB)C_ij is a very confusing notation, when what you mean is (ABC)_ij. ABC is the matrix, and ij indexes an element in ABC, not just C.

Strictly, (AB)C_ij is the matrix AB times a scalar C_ij.
 
aaah alright. Yea the notation is a bit of an issue but thanks a lot for your help! I got some more questions but I think I'll make a new thread cos its a bit different :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
735
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K