Matrix Operation: Why n^2 Steps Needed for Elimination of First Row?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnchau123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the need for n^2 operations to eliminate the first row in matrix operations when solving linear equations. Participants clarify that eliminating the first entry requires n multiplications, and repeating this process for each entry leads to a total of n*n operations. Some suggest that it might be possible to achieve this in n*(n-1) operations, depending on the method used. However, the complexity of the elimination process can vary based on the specific algorithm applied. A clear understanding of the algorithm is essential for accurately determining the number of operations required.
johnchau123
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In my note, it said that

Counting multiplication and division only, in solving linear equations (matrix operation),

Elimination of first row: total n^2 operations

So, forward elimination operations for the matrix is Σ(2 to n) k^2 = n*(n+1)*(2n+1)/6

I have tried to solve the equations but it seem do not need n^2 steps.

Can anyone tell me conceptually why it needs n^2 operations to eliminate the first row?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to eliminate the firsty entry, so you add a multiple of another row - that is n multiplications. Then you need to do the second entry in the row. That is another n multiplications in another row. You do this n times, so that is n*n operations.
 
matt grime said:
You have to eliminate the firsty entry, so you add a multiple of another row - that is n multiplications. Then you need to do the second entry in the row. That is another n multiplications in another row. You do this n times, so that is n*n operations.


But i have the following interpretation

Eliminate the first entry and this is n multiplication
Then, I do it n-1, including the first time.

So, I think it is n*(n-1).

I am quite not sure about this. :confused:
 
To be honest, I'd like you to say what it is that you're doing precisely. I'm not aware of anytime I'd actually want to eliminate the entire first row (of what, by the way? nxn matrix? Why?)
 
matt grime said:
To be honest, I'd like you to say what it is that you're doing precisely. I'm not aware of anytime I'd actually want to eliminate the entire first row (of what, by the way? nxn matrix? Why?)

The following link is a picture which shows what my note says.

http://www.badongo.com/cn/pic/526793"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doesn't really answer the questions I asked.

1) you're trying to solve simultaneous equations
2) in how many unknowns and how many equations? I presume n of each.

at least it corrects your first sentence - elimination *for* first row.

Strictly speaking you can do it n*(n-1) operations, I agree. Though you could be supposed to multiply every row by somethings so that they all have the same first entry (eg, 1), and that would be n^2 operations, generically. Unless you describe the algorithm you're attempting to cost, there's no way for anyone else to say what is really going on.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K