MHB Matrix representation of T with Basis B?

Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote un unsolved question posted in MHF on December 8th, 2012 by user bonfire09.

Problem is assuming the mapping T: P2---->P2 defined by T(a0+a1t+a2t2)=3a0+(5a0-2a1)t+(4a1+a2)t^2 is linear. Find the matrix representation of T relative to Basis B={1,t,t^2}.
The part that I am confused on is when I go plug in the basis values T(1),T(t),and T(t^2)? I don't know how to do it?

From my understanding T(a0+a1t+a2t2) can be written as a0T(1)+a1T(t)+a2T(t^2)
So to find T(1) its just a0T(1)+0T(t)+0T(t^2)=3a0+5a0t? Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Really this is not a problem relative to change of basis. Take into account that according to a well-known theorem, to find the matrix of a linear map f:V\to W with respect to basis B_V,B_W of V,W respectively, you only need to find the coordinates of the image of the elements of B_V with respect to B_W and then, to write these as columns.

In our case T is an endomorphism and only one basis is mentioned, so B_V=B_W=B. We have:
$$T(1)=3+5t\\T(t)=-2t+4t^2\\T(t^2)=t^2$$
Hence, the corresponding matrix representation is:
$$[T]_B^B=\begin{bmatrix}{3}&{\;\;0}&{0}\\{5}&{-2}&{0}\\{0}&{\;\;4}&{1}\end{bmatrix}$$
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top