Matrix string theory, contact terms, and superstring field theory

Click For Summary
A recent paper presents new insights into second quantized string field theory, suggesting promising implications for future models. The initial evaluation indicates the findings are robust, though further inquiries are anticipated. There is interest in obtaining clearer explanations for certain matrix theory concepts discussed in the paper, particularly regarding "irrelevant fields" and their scaling arguments. The discussion emphasizes the need for foundational understanding before delving deeper into complex topics. Overall, the paper is viewed positively, with expectations for ongoing exploration and clarification.
ranyart
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
A recent paper details some new insights for the second quantized
string field theory.

This has some implications for future models, it appears to be quite sound, but this is based on a confined early viewpoint of a first once over reading, no doubt there will be more questions to follow.


http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0309238
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Very nice paper. I wonder if we could get some "Baez type" explanations of some of the matrix theory statements in the paper. They don't seem impossibly deep, but I for one could use some context with them. For starters, how about the "irrelevant fields" Oni and the scaling argument surrounding them.
 
The expression learn to crawl before attempting to sprint comes to mind.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K