MHB Matrix Transforms: nxm, n->m, m->n, n+m->n/m

Imiebee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A matrix of dimension nxm
a. transforms a vector of dimension n to a vector of dimension m
b. transforms a vector of dimension m to a vector of dimension n
c. a vector of dimension n+m to a vector of dimension m
d. a vector of dimension n+m to a vector of dimension n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Matrix multiplication (note that a vector is just an m x 1 matrix)

(n x m) X (m x k) => (n x k)

See if you can figure it out now.
 
Please use a meaningful title. Please don't just "dump" your problem on us. Please show some effort so that the helpers who are helping voluntarily will actually want to help.
 
Imiebee said:
A matrix of dimension nxm
So which is the number of rows and which is the number of columns?

a. transforms a vector of dimension n to a vector of dimension m
b. transforms a vector of dimension m to a vector of dimension n
c. a vector of dimension n+m to a vector of dimension m
d. a vector of dimension n+m to a vector of dimension n
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K