MHB Max Principle: Showing $|u_1-u_2|\leq \max_{\partial{\Omega}}|g_1-g_2|$

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Principle
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality |u_1(x) - u_2(x)| ≤ max_{x ∈ ∂Ω}|g_1(x) - g_2(x)| using the maximum principle in the context of solutions to Poisson's equation. The participants derive that the difference between the two solutions, u_1 and u_2, satisfies the maximum principle, leading to bounds on their differences at the boundary. They explore cases where u_1(y) - u_2(y) is either non-negative or negative, showing that in both scenarios, the absolute difference is constrained by the maximum difference at the boundary. The final step involves confirming that the maximum of the negative difference at the boundary is less than or equal to the maximum absolute difference, completing the proof. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to clarify and solidify the mathematical argument.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $\Omega$ a bounded space. Let $u_1$ the solution of the problem $$-\Delta u_1(x)=f(x), x \in \Omega \\ u_1(x)=g_1(x), x \in \partial{\Omega}$$ and $u_2$ is the solution of the problem $$-\Delta u_2(x)=f(x), x \in \Omega \\ u_2(x)=g_2(x), x \in \partial{\Omega}$$ Using the maximum principle I have to show that $$|u_1(x)-u_2(x)| \leq \max_{x \in \partial{\Omega}}|g_1(x)-g_2(x)|, x \in \Omega$$

I have done the following:

Subtracting the two problems we get the following:

$$\Delta (u_1(x)-u_2(x))=0, x \in \Omega \\ u_1(x)-u_2(x)=g_1(x)-g_2(x), x \in \partial{\Omega} $$ and $$\Delta(-(u_1(x)-u_2(x)))=0, x\in \Omega \\ -(u_1(x)-u_2(x))=-(g_1(x)-g_2(x)), x \in \partial{\Omega}$$ Since $\Delta (u_1-u_2) \geq 0$, from the maximum for $u_1-u_2$ we have that $$\max_{\Omega}(u_1-u_2)=\max_{\partial{\Omega}}(u_1-u_2)=\max_{\partial{\Omega}}(g_1-g_2)$$ Since $\Delta (-(u_1-u_2)) \geq 0$, from the maximum for $-(u_1-u_2)$ we have that $$\max_{\Omega}(-(u_1-u_2))=\max_{\partial{\Omega}}(-(u_1-u_2))=\max_{\partial{\Omega}}(-(g_1-g_2))$$ Since $$\max (-(u_1-u_2))=\min (u_1-u_2)$$ we have that $$\min_{\Omega}(u_1-u_2) \leq u_1-u_2 \leq \max_{\Omega}(u_1-u_2) \\ \Rightarrow \max_{\partial{\Omega}}(-(g_1-g_2)) \leq u_1-u_2 \leq \max_{\partial{\Omega}}(g_1-g_2)$$

Is this correct so far?? How could we continue to show that $$|u_1(x)-u_2(x)| \leq \max_{x \in \partial{\Omega}}|g_1(x)-g_2(x)|, x \in \Omega$$ ?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Is this correct so far?? How could we continue to show that $$|u_1(x)-u_2(x)| \leq \max_{x \in \partial{\Omega}}|g_1(x)-g_2(x)|, x \in \Omega$$ ?? (Wondering)

Hi! (Blush)

Looks good to me. (Nod)

Suppose we distinguish cases... (Thinking)

Suppose that at some point $y \in \Omega$ we have that $u_1(y) - u_2(y) \ge 0$.
Then:
$$|u_1(y) - u_2(y)| = u_1(y) - u_2(y) \le \max_{x \in \partial \Omega} (g_1(x)-g_2(x)) \le \max_{x \in \partial \Omega} |g_1(x)-g_2(x)|$$

Now suppose that $u_1(y) - u_2(y) < 0$... (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Looks good to me. (Nod)
(Happy)

I like Serena said:
Suppose we distinguish cases... (Thinking)

Suppose that at some point $y \in \Omega$ we have that $u_1(y) - u_2(y) \ge 0$.
Then:
$$|u_1(y) - u_2(y)| = u_1(y) - u_2(y) \le \max_{x \in \partial \Omega} (g_1(x)-g_2(x)) \le \max_{x \in \partial \Omega} |g_1(x)-g_2(x)|$$

Now suppose that $u_1(y) - u_2(y) < 0$... (Thinking)

When we have that $u_1(y)-u_2(y)<0$, then:

$$|u_1(y)-u_2(y)|=-(u_1(y)-u_2(y)) \leq \max_{x \in \Omega} (-(u_1(x)-u_2(x)))=\max_{x \in \partial{\Omega}} (-(g_1(x)-g_2(x)))$$

Is this correct so far?? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
When we have that $u_1(y)-u_2(y)<0$, then:

$$|u_1(y)-u_2(y)|=-(u_1(y)-u_2(y)) \leq \max_{x \in \Omega} (-(u_1(x)-u_2(x)))=\max_{x \in \partial{\Omega}} (-(g_1(x)-g_2(x)))$$

Is this correct so far?? (Wondering)

Yup.
Now we only need that $\max\limits_{x \in \partial{\Omega}} (-(g_1(x)-g_2(x))) \le \max\limits_{x \in \partial{\Omega}} |g_1(x)-g_2(x)|$... (Thinking)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K