MHB Max Real Value of $p$ for Triangles with Positive Sides

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find the maximum real value of $p$ if for any triple of positive real numbers $m,\,n,\,k$ that satisfies the inequality $pmnk>m^3+n^3+k^3$, there exists a triangle with side lengths $m,\,n,\,k$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]The triple $(m,n,k) = (2,1,1)$ satisfies $m^3+n^3+k^3 = 5mnk$. Since those three lengths do not form a triangle, it follows that $p$ cannot be greater than $5$. To show that $p=5$ does have the given property, it will be sufficient to show that every triple $(m,n,k)$ of lengths that do not form a triangle must satisfy the inequality $m^3 + n^3 + k^3 \geqslant 5mnk.$

We may assume that $k$ is the largest of the three numbers. Then the condition that $m$, $n$, $k$ do not form a triangle is $m+n\leqslant k$. The inequality $m^3 + n^3 + k^3 \geqslant 5mnk$ is homogeneous of degree $3$, so it will be sufficient to scale $m$, $n$, $k$ so that $k=1$ and $m+n\leqslant1$. The inequality then becomes $5mn - m^3 - n^3 \leqslant 1.$ Thus we want to find the maximum value of $f(m,n) = 5mn - m^3 - n^3$ in the triangle $m\geqslant 0$, $n\geqslant 0$, $m+n\leqslant 1.$

The function $f(m,n)$ has no critical points inside the triangle (in fact, its only critical points are $(0,0)$ and $\bigl(\frac53,\frac53\bigr)$), so its maximum value must occur on the boundary. If $m=0$ or $n=0$ then $f(m,n)=0$. If $m+n=1$ then $$f(m,n) = 5m(1-m) - m^3 - (1-m)^3 = -8m^2 + 8m - 1 = 1 - 2(2m-1)^2,$$ which has a maximum value $1$ (when $m= \frac12$). Therefore $f(m,n)\leqslant 1$ in the triangle, as required.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]The triple $(m,n,k) = (2,1,1)$ satisfies $m^3+n^3+k^3 = 5mnk$. Since those three lengths do not form a triangle, it follows that $p$ cannot be greater than $5$. To show that $p=5$ does have the given property, it will be sufficient to show that every triple $(m,n,k)$ of lengths that do not form a triangle must satisfy the inequality $m^3 + n^3 + k^3 \geqslant 5mnk.$

We may assume that $k$ is the largest of the three numbers. Then the condition that $m$, $n$, $k$ do not form a triangle is $m+n\leqslant k$. The inequality $m^3 + n^3 + k^3 \geqslant 5mnk$ is homogeneous of degree $3$, so it will be sufficient to scale $m$, $n$, $k$ so that $k=1$ and $m+n\leqslant1$. The inequality then becomes $5mn - m^3 - n^3 \leqslant 1.$ Thus we want to find the maximum value of $f(m,n) = 5mn - m^3 - n^3$ in the triangle $m\geqslant 0$, $n\geqslant 0$, $m+n\leqslant 1.$

The function $f(m,n)$ has no critical points inside the triangle (in fact, its only critical points are $(0,0)$ and $\bigl(\frac53,\frac53\bigr)$), so its maximum value must occur on the boundary. If $m=0$ or $n=0$ then $f(m,n)=0$. If $m+n=1$ then $$f(m,n) = 5m(1-m) - m^3 - (1-m)^3 = -8m^2 + 8m - 1 = 1 - 2(2m-1)^2,$$ which has a maximum value $1$ (when $m= \frac12$). Therefore $f(m,n)\leqslant 1$ in the triangle, as required.[/sp]

Well done, Opalg, well done!(Clapping)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top