MHB Max Value of $b$ for Real Roots of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max Roots Value
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $a$ and $b$ be real numbers and $r,\,s$ and $t$ be the roots of $f(x)=x^3+ax^2+bx-1$ and $g(x)=x^3+mx^2+nx+p$ has roots $r^2,\,s^2$ and $t^2$. If $g(-1)=-5$, find the maximum possible value of $b$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Rewrite $g(x)$ in terms of $a$ and $b$...
 
From Vieta's formulas, we know

$=a=r+s+t,\,b=rs+st+tr,\,1=rst$

and

$m=-(r^2+s^2+t^2),\,n=r^2s^2+s^2t^2+t^2r^2,\,p=-r^2s^2t^2$

Let's try to express $m,\,n$ and $p$ in terms of $a$ and $b$. The easiest one is $p$:
$p=-(rst)^2=-1$

From $m$, we square $r+s+t$:
$a^2=(r+s+t)^2=r^2+s^2+t^2+2(rs+st+tr)=-m+2b\implies m=2b-a^2$

Finally, for $n$ we can square $rs+st+tr$:
$b^2=(rs+st+tr)^2=r^2s^2+s^2t^2+t^2r^2+2(r^2st+rs^2t+t^2rs)=n+2rst(r+s+t)=n-2a\implies n=b^2+2a$

So now we write $g(x)$ in terms of $a$ and $b$:
$g(x)=x^3+(2b-a^2)x^2+(b^2+2a)x-1$

We know that $g(-1)=-5$; when we plug this into our equation for $g(x)$ we get

$-5=(-1)^3+(2b-a^2)(-1)^2+(b^2+2a)(-1)-1=1b-a^2-b^2-2a-2\implies a^2+2a+b^2-2b-3=0$

We seek the largest possible value of $b$. Since $a$ is real, we know that the discriminant of this quadratic must be non-negative. In particular,

$2^2-4(b^2-2b-3)\ge 0\implies b^2-2b-4\le 0$

Solving this quadratic gives us that the largest possible value of $b$ is $1+\sqrt{5}$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top