Maxima word problem - Not sure about my answer.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a maxima word problem where a builder aims to construct a rectangular building with a square base under a budget of $1650. The cost of materials for the walls and roof is given, leading to the equation $1650 = 55L^2 + 100HL, where L is the length of the base and H is the height. An initial attempt suggests that a cube may maximize volume, leading to the calculation of L as approximately 3.263 meters. Participants suggest finding expressions for volume in terms of one variable and eliminating unknowns to solve for maximum volume. The conversation emphasizes the need for calculus to confirm the optimal dimensions while exploring different approaches to the problem.
Bradyns
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Maxima word problem -- Not sure about my answer.

This was in an assignment handed out after our introduction to extrema's.
A builder wants to build a small building consisting of 4 walls and a roof (all rectangular). The cost of the bricks for the walls will be $25/square metre, while the roof materials will cost $55/square metre. The building must have a square base, but otherwise may have any dimensions the builder wishes. If the builder’s budget is $1650 then what dimensions would make the build have the largest possible volume?

The attempt at a solution
Premise: A cube will maximize the volume for surface area in this solution.

Roof (A) = L2
Walls (B) = 4 × (L2)

$1650 = $55A + $25(4B)
$1650 = $55A + $100B

$1650 = $55L2 + $100L2
$1650 = $155L2
$1650 / $155 = L2

L = √($1650 / $155)

L≈3.262692338m
L≈3.263m (3.d.p)

For a calculus problem, I am scared that I have not had to use calculus. :/
There was another approaches before I used this method..
Such as..

================================================
Roof (A) = L2
Walls (B) = 4 × (HL) <------------Where h is an variable height.

1650 = A + 4B
1650 = L2 + 4HL
1650 = 55L2 + 100HL

55L2 + 100HL -1650 = 0

But, I couldn't think beyond this.. :/

Also, using 1650 = 55L2 + 100HL,
I managed to arbitrarily plug and chug a result of L=3m H=3.85m
================================================
EDIT:

I've established that the Volume would be L2H

V = L2H
A = L2
B = HL
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Have you tried finding an expression for the volume in terms of H or L alone?
 


Simon Bridge said:
Have you tried finding an expression for the volume in terms of H or L alone?

In which way?

I could make V= 55L2H
{Area of the base × height.}

I haven't tried using my premise that the most efficient {volume:surface area} is a cube, with the implication of V= L3

I'll give that a shot.

Otherwise, I am truly stumped.
 
Last edited:


No - I mean you have two simultaneous equations and three unknowns ... why not eliminate one of the unknowns in the equation that starts V= ?

For instance ... from 1650=55L2+100HL ... you can solve it for H, then substitute into V=HL2 ... which gives you V in terms of L. Now you can find the maxima.

You could assume that the shape is a cube - but you still have to prove that a cube is the right shape.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K