Maximizing Airflow for Screen Printing Table

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airflow
Click For Summary
Building a screen printing table requires effective airflow to hold down thick paper, with discussions centering on using fans for suction. Computer fans may not provide sufficient pressure, while bathroom exhaust fans have shown better results in tests. A small vacuum can also create adequate suction, but portability is a concern for the user. CFM (cubic feet per minute) is crucial for measuring airflow, indicating the volume of air moved rather than speed. Ultimately, a bathroom fan has proven effective in practice, offering a cost-efficient solution for maintaining paper flat during printing.
Patrick
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi all, I'm going to be building a screen printing table and ran into a question of airflow. Not being much of a science minded person I came across this site and thought I might find some help. Basically think of a box (4x25x35 roughly) it's airtight. except for a bunch of 1/16" holes drilled through the top. The holes are to hold down the paper. Now I need something to propel the air out of the box so that it sucks in through the holes, sucking down the paper. I had thought computer fans would be nice as they would fit nicely and they are light and can be transported easily. my question is how much cfm would the fans have to be able to push to pull the paper flat (the paper is relatively thick BTW). Is there a formula of somekind that could help me here, or does anyone know roughly through experience what it would take? I looked around and most fans seem to move between 35-119 that are the right size. Another question is if this could be done with say two or three, et cetera, would it push as much air if the fan were lined side by side as if they were sandwiched together producing a tunnel of sorts. It almost seems logical to me that a tunnel might move more air, any insight is appreciated.
Patrick
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
a small-vac will do the trick. A 2 gallon vac will produce enough vacuum to firmly hold paper down. You might get away with a gallon vac even. I'd buy the smaller one, give it a try. If it doesn't work, take it back, and get a slightly larger one.
 
Suction power is far more important than flow rate. Faust9's suggestion is the most inexpensive way to create a vacuum table.

BTW, plugging unused holes on the table surface around the border of the piece (assuming it doesn't cover them all) will reduce the flow rate needed by the fan also, so you might get by with the little vac, or if you need the flexibility to leave some holes open you might need a bigger one.

Cliff
 
I appreciate the feedback, I was trying to get around using a vacuum though as the unit needs to be easy to transport. I'm now thinking a bathroom exhaust fan might be the ticket. Another question though, how is cfm measured, is it the amount of air, or the speed of the air, the reason I ask is many ceiling fans are the same as computer fans which seemed odd as I thought it was an amount.
Patrick
 
CFM is an amount, like a gallon is an amount of liquid. Speed would be MPH or ft/s.

A regular computer fan doesn't generate much positive/negative pressure. A bathroom fan might be a little better, but most will just barely hold up a paper towel (something to try in your bathroom).

A vacuum is typically optimized for higher pressure (negative, or vacum) and lower flow. A one gallon shop vac like Wal-Mart carries is pretty tiny. Maybe even a dust-buster sized unit.

Cliff
 
thanks for the info cliff. the cfm was hanging me up. I did try a bathroom fan with the thick paper i will be using and it was able to suck the paper flat and stay by itself even with the weight of the paper working against it. the table will have the weight of the paper working with it so I think it will work. basically I'm trying to make this as cheap as possible and a ceiling fan can be had for 15 bucks where as a vacuum is usually quite a bit higher.
Patrick
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K