Maximizing Gradient for Steep Climb on Hill Surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the direction of steepest ascent on a hill represented by the surface equation z=100exp((-x^2+3y^2)/701) at the point (30, 20, 5). Participants clarify that to find this direction, one must compute the gradient vector of z, which involves calculating the partial derivatives of z with respect to x and y, as z is a function of these two variables. The confusion regarding the inclusion of z in the gradient computation is addressed, emphasizing that only the partial derivatives of z concerning x and y are necessary for this analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gradient vectors in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Familiarity with the concept of steepest ascent in mathematical optimization
  • Basic proficiency in interpreting mathematical functions and surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the computation of gradient vectors in multivariable functions
  • Learn about the application of partial derivatives in optimization problems
  • Explore the concept of directional derivatives and their significance
  • Investigate real-world applications of gradient ascent in fields like machine learning
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and data science who are interested in optimization techniques and gradient calculations for functions of multiple variables.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1
"You are standing at the point (30, 20, 5) on a hill with the shape of the surface z=100exp((-x^2+3y^2)/701). In what direction should you proceed in order to climb most steeply?"

SInce the grad vector allegedly points in the most steep direction of the surface, I guess I'll have to compute that one. But I'm not sure if I'm suppoesd to compute the partials of all of x, y and z or only x and y in the gradient. How can I know that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: z is a function of x and y.
 
the thing is, it depends on what kind of increase you want. obviously from the question, it implies the direction that z ("climb most steeply") increases most rapidly. so, take the derivatives with respect to z.
 
No, it doesn't. You are given that z is a function of x and y so take the gradient of z using the partial derivatives of z with respcect to x and y. (That may be what tim lou meant to say.)

It would make no sense to talk about taking partial derivatives of x and y- with respect to what other variables?

SInce the grad vector allegedly points in the most steep direction of the surface, I guess I'll have to compute that one.
Why "allegedly"? And you surely, by "that one" mean the gradient of z don't you? So why was there any question?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
2K