Directional Derivative at an Angle with a 3d Gradient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the directional derivative of the function ##f\left(x,y,z\right)=xy+z^2## at the point (4, 2, 1) in a specified direction defined by an angle of ##\frac{3π}{4}## with respect to the gradient vector ##\nabla f(4, 2, 1)##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenge of determining the correct orientation of the unit vector given only one angle. There are attempts to conceptualize the problem by considering vectors perpendicular to the gradient and the implications of the angle on the directional derivative.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested a formula for calculating the directional derivative, while others are exploring the implications of the angle on the result. There is an acknowledgment of a potential misunderstanding regarding the need to find a vector in the new direction first.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the reliance on a single angle to define the direction and the implications of this on the calculation of the directional derivative.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,205
Reaction score
7,687

Homework Statement


Find the directional derivative using ##f\left(x,y,z\right)=xy+z^2## at the point (4, 2, 1) in the direction of a vector making an angle of ##\frac{3π}{4}## with ##\nabla f(4, 2, 1)##.

Homework Equations


##f\left(x,y,z\right)=xy+z^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the gradient of ##f(4, 2, 1)## as ##\langle 2,4,2 \rangle##.
Now I'm not sure what to do next. I have a 3d vector, but they only give me one angle, so I don't know which orientation the new unit vector is at.

It's taken me about 30 min to type all this up (I keep going back and adding and deleting stuff), and I've got to go to an exam for another class, but I just now thought of this: I think that if I knew which direction I had to rotate I could solve this by finding a vector perpendicular to the gradient vector and a vector opposite of the gradient vector and then adding them together to get a vector at 3π/4 from the gradient vector. Knowing that would allow me to get the unit vector I need to solve this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Drakkith said:

Homework Statement


Find the directional derivative using ##f\left(x,y,z\right)=xy+z^2## at the point (4, 2, 1) in the direction of a vector making an angle of ##\frac{3π}{4}## with ##\nabla f(4, 2, 1)##.

Homework Equations


##f\left(x,y,z\right)=xy+z^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the gradient of ##f(4, 2, 1)## as ##\langle 2,4,2 \rangle##.
Now I'm not sure what to do next. I have a 3d vector, but they only give me one angle, so I don't know which orientation the new unit vector is at.

It's taken me about 30 min to type all this up (I keep going back and adding and deleting stuff), and I've got to go to an exam for another class, but I just now thought of this: I think that if I knew which direction I had to rotate I could solve this by finding a vector perpendicular to the gradient vector and a vector opposite of the gradient vector and then adding them together to get a vector at 3π/4 from the gradient vector. Knowing that would allow me to get the unit vector I need to solve this.
There is a shorter way than we discussed in that recent similar 2D problem. Use$$
D_{\hat u}f(P) = \nabla f(P)\cdot \hat u = |\nabla f(P)||\hat u|\cos\theta$$
 
LCKurtz said:
There is a shorter way than we discussed in that recent similar 2D problem. Use$$
D_{\hat u}f(P) = \nabla f(P)\cdot \hat u = |\nabla f(P)||\hat u|\cos\theta$$

Wait... does that mean the directional derivative is the same at all orientations of 3π/4?

Also, I got an answer of ##-2\sqrt{3}##, which is correct. Thanks Kurtz.
 
Drakkith said:
Wait... does that mean the directional derivative is the same at all orientations of 3π/4?
Assuming you mean all orientations from the gradient direction, then yes it does. And you could have done the earlier problem this way too. For some reason in that other problem I got the impression you were to find a vector in the new direction first.
 
LCKurtz said:
Assuming you mean all orientations from the gradient direction, then yes it does. And you could have done the earlier problem this way too. For some reason in that other problem I got the impression you were to find a vector in the new direction first.

That was my impression too. I thought I was supposed to find a vector first. :frown:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K