Maximizing Speed: Releasing the Ball from a Cliff

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenDoty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Speed
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the release of a ball from a cliff and determining which method of release results in the greatest speed upon impact. The subject area includes concepts of kinematics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different scenarios: dropping the ball, throwing it downward, and throwing it upward. There are attempts to apply kinematic equations and conservation of energy principles to analyze the outcomes.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning each other's reasoning and assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of kinematic equations and the importance of initial velocities. There is a recognition of the need for calculations to support claims about final velocities.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the absence of specific information, such as the height of the cliff and the angle of release for the upward throw. There is also mention of not having learned certain energy conservation principles, which may limit the approaches available to them.

StephenDoty
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
You are standing on a cliff with arm extended. You release a ball.
Which will cause the ball to hit the bottom of the cliff with the greatest speed

Releasing the ball and letting it drop
throwing the ball downward with a velocity of 20m/s
or throwing the ball upward with a velocity of 30m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must show some thought/work to get help here. What are your thoughts on this problem?
 
If the ball is dropped it accelerates a -9.8m/s
if a ball is thrown downward at 20m/s then the final velocity would be the 20m/s
If a ball was thrown upward at 30m/s then it would have more time to pick up speed

so I think the greatest speed comes from the ball being thrown upward at 30m/s
 
You are correct, but I think your reasoning is a little off. If the ball is throw upward with a speed of 30 m/s, when it comes back down to the height of your hand, it'll have a downward velocity of 30m/s. Thus, it's initial velocity on the downward trip is higher. Why does starting at a higher initial velocity mean it'll have a higher final velocity?

Also, the final speed of the ball in #2 is not 20m/s. Isn't it accelerating in this case too?

What you can do for practice is let the height of the cliff be 1, and figure out what the final velocity for each ball would be. It should come out to be #3 like you said, but maybe if you work through each case, it'll help you get a better grasp of what is happening to each ball's velocity as it falls.
 
Last edited:
StephenDoty said:
If the ball is dropped it accelerates a -9.8m/s
if a ball is thrown downward at 20m/s then the final velocity would be the 20m/s
this does not follow.

If a ball was thrown upward at 30m/s then it would have more time to pick up speed
so I think the greatest speed comes from the ball being thrown upward at 30m/s

It has more time to pick up speed, but you didn't prove it. I wouldn't accept this without a computation.

I assume we can ignore air resistance. This problem is easiest using conservation of energy. In all 3 cases the ball starts with the same potential energy and in all 3 cases the ball ends with the same potential energy. You have to find out in which case the ball has the most kinetic energy at the bottom of the cliff.
 
I was not given the acceleration of any of the cases

If the ball thrown upward has a velocity of 30m/s when it reaches the height of the cliff then it still has gravity acting on it allowing it gain velocity. I could not use 10m for the cliff and solve because I was not given the angle it was thrown. It might have been thrown directly up or not.

I do not know how to even start working with case #2.

thank you for your help. I really appreciate it.
Stephen
 
We have not learned PE=KE even though ke=.5mv^2
and we are not even given the mass

so we can only use the kinimatics equations
 
Well, let's think.

We have a start y position called y0 and an finishing y position called y1.

So we know that

v^2 = v^2 o + 2a(y1-y0)

Let's consider the first case:

The starting velocity is 0, so we have

v^2 = 2(-9.8)(-y)

Now consider the second case,

We end up with

v^2 = -20^2 + 2(-9.8)(-y)

Lastly we have

v^2 = 30^2 + 2 -(9.8)(-y)

Out of all these equations, which appears to give you the greatest final velocity?

Edit, I used 1 d motion to keep the idea simple. You can mess with the equations by adding the cosine and sine if you wish to do it in 2d motion. Simply add the cosines and sines where they belong and use arbitrary angles. I'm pretty sure this is the way you should look at this type of problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K