Maximizing Summation of F_t*R: Partial Derivative w.r.t R

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Patrick94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamic Optimization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on maximizing the summation of the function F_t(R) / (1+d)^i, where F_t is defined recursively as F_{t-1}[(R)(I_p) +(1-R)(I_r)]. To find the optimal value of R, participants confirm the necessity of taking the partial derivative with respect to R and setting it to zero. The process involves substituting F_t with its definition, differentiating the entire summation, and solving the resulting equation for R. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring all variables dependent on R are explicitly defined before differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with recursive functions
  • Knowledge of optimization techniques
  • Basic concepts of summation notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers for constrained optimization
  • Learn about the properties of recursive functions in mathematical modeling
  • Explore numerical methods for solving optimization problems
  • Investigate the implications of multiple local maxima in optimization
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, data analysts, and anyone involved in optimization problems, particularly those working with recursive functions and partial derivatives.

Patrick94
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have the summation (from i=0 to n) of (F[itex]_{t}[/itex])(R) / (1+d)^i
where F[itex]_{t}[/itex] = (F[itex]_{t-1}[/itex])[(R)(I[itex]_{p}[/itex]) +(1-R)(I[itex]_{r}[/itex])]

(The F[itex]_{t-1}[/itex] is referring to the value of F in the last period)

I want to find the value of R that maximizes the summation. So must I take the partial derivative wrt R? How do I do this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So wait, [itex]F_t[/itex] and [itex]R[/itex] don't depend on [itex]i[/itex]? What is [itex]I_p[/itex] and [itex]I_r[/itex]?

If those things don't depend on [itex]i[/itex] you can pull them out of the sum.

Regardless, you can treat the entire thing as a function of [itex]R[/itex]. ([itex]f(R)=...[/itex]. Summation on right side.)

You can imagine that as you change the value of [itex]R[/itex], the value of [itex]f[/itex] changes as well. It's hard to get an idea of what this function may look like if you plotted it, but the point is to find [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial R}[/itex] and set it equal to zero.

[itex]F_t[/itex] is a constant that depends on your choice of R and depends on the already defined constant [itex]F_{t-1}[/itex]. Since you are taking the derivative w.r.t R, you first want to replace [itex]F_t[/itex] in the sum with its definition. You may have to do something similar with [itex]I_p[/itex] and [itex]I_r[/itex], depending on what they are defined as. However, once you have the entire thing expressed explicitly in terms of R, (i.e. all values that depend on R are written out in full), then you can take [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial R}[/itex]. It's important to remember that the differentiation operator [itex]\frac{\partial}{\partial R}[/itex] can be moved inside the sum and you can take the derivative of each term of the sum independently.

Once you have taken the derivative w.r.t R, (i.e. you've found [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial R}[/itex],) you must set it equal to zero and solve like a normal optimization problem. Hopefully there is only one solution to the resulting equation, telling you the desired value of R. It is possible however that there may be multiple places were [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial R}[/itex] is equal to zero, in this case you have to do a little bit of investigating to determine which value of R really maximizes the sum.

I hope I am understanding your question right and I hope this helps in some way. Good luck
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K