Taking the partial time derivative of a functional

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for the partial time derivative of a functional, specifically in the context of coordinate transformations. The equation presented is $$\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\right|_r = \left.\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\right|_x + \left.\frac{\partial \vec{x}}{\partial t}\right|_r \cdot \nabla_x$$, where ##\nabla_r = \frac{1}{a}\nabla_x##. The conversation highlights the importance of using the chain rule for coordinate transformations and clarifies the distinction between differential operators and derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functionals and their notation
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and differential operators
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in multivariable calculus
  • Proficiency in applying the chain rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in coordinate transformations
  • Explore the properties of differential operators in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about functionals and their derivatives in physics
  • Investigate the implications of coordinate transformations in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or differential equations, particularly those interested in coordinate transformations and functional analysis.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
Let us suppose we have a functional of f such that ##f=f((\vec{r}(t),t)## where ##\vec{r}(t) = a(t)\vec{x}(t)##.

I am trying to derive an equation such that

$$\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\right|_r = \left.\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\right|_x + \left.\frac{\partial \vec{x}}{\partial t}\right|_r \cdot \nabla_x $$

where ##\nabla_r = \frac{1}{a}\nabla_x##

It is actually about coordinate transformation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation doesn't make any sense. Firstly, you wrote an equation of differential operators, not derivatives. Secondly, you evaluate an operator depending on one variable at a location of another variable. What does that mean? If it is only a coordinate transformation, then you need the chain rule, that's all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K