Maximum compression of a spring

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 13K views
supersingh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




A 50-kg mass is dropped from a 20-m height onto a very long, initially uncompressed spring of force constant k = 100 N/m

Homework Equations


Ueo=Ugf+Uef
F=k(Lenght Final-length initial)


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using Ueo=Ugf+Uef, and i couldn't figure out what to use for some of the values.
so far i got 1/2*4.9^2=Ugf+Uef, i don't know what to put for the final heights.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
supersingh said:

Homework Statement




A 50-kg mass is dropped from a 20-m height onto a very long, initially uncompressed spring of force constant k = 100 N/m

Em but what exactly is the question asking to solve here?
 
oh my bad, its asking what is the maximum compression of the spring
 
supersingh said:
oh my bad, its asking what is the maximum compression of the spring

Ahh my bad, should have heeded the title a little better.:blushing:

Well, what will determine how much the spring decreases in length by? Using this can you work out the length the spring decreases by?
 
i found out that when the object is in equllibrium, the spring goes displaces 4.9 m using
mg=k(l-L) where k is 100 and the mass is 50
 
supersingh said:
i found out that when the object is in equllibrium, the spring goes displaces 4.9 m using
mg=k(l-L) where k is 100 and the mass is 50
The equilibrium point is not needed for this problem.

Hint: In calculating the change in gravitational PE, be sure to use the total change in height.
 
supersingh said:
i found out that when the object is in equllibrium, the spring goes displaces 4.9 m using
mg=k(l-L) where k is 100 and the mass is 50

Yes but are you sure it's [mg=k(l-L)]

Edit: Ahh I've been beaten me here.
 
im pretty sure it is, because the problem before it needed that height to calculate the velocity at equillibrium, and i got that
 
supersingh said:
im pretty sure it is, because the problem before it needed that height to calculate the velocity at equillibrium, and i got that

Maybe, but in this case the equilibrium position doesn't matter, because the most the spring can be compressed is the force of mass that fell onto it.
 
Another hint: This is a conservation of energy problem.
 
in the intial situations, there is only intial elastic potential
then for the final, there is final elastic and final gravitational. what value should i use for the height for the gravitational value?
 
Initially, there's only gravitational PE. Hint: If you measure gravitational PE using the lowest position of the mass as the zero point, then in the final position (of maximum compression) there will only be elastic PE.

Another hint: Call the amount by which the spring compresses X.
 
wait, i got it, thanks everyone, i now used Ugo=Uef+Ugf