Maximum Height of Ball on U-Shaped Ramp

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the maximum height a solid ball reaches on a frictionless U-shaped ramp, determined by energy conservation principles. The initial potential energy (mgh) converts into both linear and rotational kinetic energy as the ball descends. The final height (h') achieved by the ball is calculated as h' = (5/7)h, indicating that not all potential energy is converted back during the ascent due to the absence of friction, which prevents the rotational energy from contributing to the climb.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Basic grasp of frictionless motion and its implications on energy transfer
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in rotational motion
  • Learn about the effects of friction on energy transfer in mechanical systems
  • Explore the dynamics of rolling motion and its equations
  • Investigate the impact of different ramp angles (θ) on the motion of the ball
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation and rotational dynamics in frictionless environments.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


From an İnitial Lenght h,a solid ball rolls smoothly down one side of a U-shaped ramp and then moves up the other side,which is frictionless.What maximum height does the ball reach ?

Homework Equations


Energy conservation equations

The Attempt at a Solution


İnitial Kinetic energy is mgh and final energy wlll be mgh'...Is there some lost energy ?.When the object goes down it has also rotational energy,but when it climbs it cannot rotate so there's no rotational energy so
##mgh'=\frac 1 2mv^2## and ##mgh=\frac 1 2Iω^2+\frac 1 2mv^2## (In bottom)

from that I gain ##h'=h-\frac {v^2} {5g}## but answer says ##h'=\frac {5h} {7}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:
When the object goes down it has also rotational energy,but when it climbs it cannot rotate so there's no rotational energy ##
What would cause the ball to stop rotating when it starts up the other side?
 
TSny said:
What would cause the ball to stop rotating when it starts up the other side?
no friction
 
Why would the absence of friction stop the rotational motion of the ball?
 
there would be no torque to rotate the ball ?
 
If something is already rotating, you don't need a torque to keep it rotating. Think of a spinning top. If no friction acts on the top, then it will keep spinning "forever". You would need a torque to stop it rotating.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
I got 5h/7 as an answer. I couldn't follow what you were doing so I can't really help troubleshoot.
 
The main idea that I stucked is where is the lost energy ? initially it is energy is ##mgh## right ?
 
It looked like the two initial equations you wrote were correct. The initial potential energy is converted to linear and rotational kinetic energy. And then you showed the final potential (edit correction) energy equal to the linear kinetic energy. That is right. There is no longer any friction so the ball just keeps rotating with no friction to stop it. Therefore, that rotational kinetic energy is not lost (it just keeps going), but it does not get converted back to potential energy. So it looked to me like your thinking was correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #10
TomHart said:
It looked like the two initial equations you wrote were correct. The initial potential energy is converted to linear and rotational kinetic energy. And then you showed the final potential (edit correction) energy equal to the linear kinetic energy. That is right. There is no longer any friction so the ball just keeps rotating with no friction to stop it. Therefore, that rotational kinetic energy is not lost (it just keeps going), but it does not get converted back to potential energy. So it looked to me like your thinking was correct.

then where am I going wrong ?
 
  • #11
Arman777 said:
The main idea that I stucked is where is the lost energy ? initially it is energy is ##mgh## right ?
Is the ball rotating at the start? Is it rotating at the bottom of the U? Is it rotating when it reaches its highest point on the other side?
 
  • #12
Arman777 said:
then where am I going wrong ?
I don't know. I can't see any in between steps.
 
  • #13
Arman777 said:
then where am I going wrong ?
You have left v in your answer, which is not a given variable. You need to express v in terms of h.
 
  • #14
I found it finally,Just one question,
TomHart said:
here is no longer any friction so the ball just keeps rotating with no friction to stop it.
I understand this part.
TomHart said:
Therefore, that rotational kinetic energy is not lost (it just keeps going), but it does not get converted back to potential energy.
so the change in rotational energy is zero that's why it didnt converted to potantial energy ?
 
  • #15
Even there's no friction ball with rotate but it will not converted to potantial energy ? .I thought it will not rotate and then derive those equations but I see that it will rotate...
 
  • #16
Arman777 said:
so the change in rotational energy is zero that's why it didnt converted to potantial energy ?
Right. Once the ball hits the no-friction surface, it will just keep spinning forever - well, or until it slides back down and hits the surface with friction again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #17
TomHart said:
Right. Once the ball hits the no-friction surface, it will just keep spinning forever - well, or until it slides back down and hits the surface with friction again.

I see now...withouth friction just gravaity will affect and it will came back with an acceleration (ıf its a ramp at angle ##θ## then ##a=mgsinθ##)
 
  • #18
Yes, if there was friction on both sides of the U, the rotational energy of the ball would help to drive it upward and it would reach the original height that it started from on the original side. Without friction on the upward climb, that rotational energy never gets engaged to help with the climb.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
727