Maximum power developed by a lift

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum power developed by a lift cage with a mass of 539 kg, accelerating to a velocity of 6 m/s over a distance of 14 m, while overcoming a frictional resistance of 205 N. Participants clarify that maximum power is not the same as work done; rather, it is calculated using the formula Power = Force x Speed, where the force includes both the frictional force and the force required for acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering both the increase in potential energy and the forces acting on the lift during its ascent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concepts of work, energy, and power
  • Knowledge of basic physics formulas, including Power = Work/Time
  • Ability to calculate forces and energy changes in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn how to calculate tension in lifting cables under varying conditions
  • Study the effects of friction on mechanical systems and how to account for it in calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in dynamics, including acceleration and its impact on power calculations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in mechanical design or analysis of lifting systems will benefit from this discussion, especially those looking to deepen their understanding of power calculations in dynamic systems.

MNWO
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I've been given a question where it asks me to work out : work done , the tension in lifting cable and the maximum power developed and the problem is that I don't know what the maximum power developed means. Isn't it the same as the work done ? If its not, then what's the formula to work out the maximum power developed? Here is the question just in case ;)
A lift cage of mass 539kg accelerates upwards from rest to a velocity of 6m/s whilst traveling a distance of 14m. The frictional resistance to motion is 205 N. Making use of the principle of the conservation of energy, determine: work done , the tension in lifting cable , the maximum power developed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Power is rate of doing work. But, of course, with a counterweight, during the actual climb, at uniform velocity, you would only need to be overcoming friction. Serious power is needed during the acceleration phase.
 
Another approach could be to assume that there's no counterweight. So, concerning work, you should remember two portions:

1) The work associated with the force of friction...
2) The increase in potential energy of the cage due to the climb...

And, concerning the tension in the lifting cable, I count three forces to be reckoned with... And to be calculated and added...

Although Sophiecentaur states that the climb is at uniform velocity, I understand, from the formulation, that the lift moves with a constant acceleration, so the power needed is uniform during the climb, and -knowing the acceleration and the distance- you could calculate the time needed. You know already the work done, and as power = work/time...
 
NTW said:
Another approach could be to assume that there's no counterweight. So, concerning work, you should remember two portions:

1) The work associated with the force of friction...
2) The increase in potential energy of the cage due to the climb...

And, concerning the tension in the lifting cable, I count three forces to be reckoned with... And to be calculated and added...

Although Sophiecentaur states that the climb is at uniform velocity, I understand, from the formulation, that the lift moves with a constant acceleration, so the power needed is uniform during the climb, and -knowing the acceleration and the distance- you could calculate the time needed. You know already the work done, and as power = work/time...
What would be the point of assuming no counterweight? What sort of engineer would miss out an all that free GPE every time the lift operates? But perhaps the question was written by a Physics Teacher. :rolleyes: It would only need for the word "cage" to be changed into "load" and it would make sense for and Engineer and a Physicist.
It would be only the GPE of the load that is significant because the counterweight is chosen to be a bit heavier than the cage itself. But enough said.

As for the question. I reckon you just need to find the accelerating force needed and add it to the friction force. Then Power is Force times Speed. If the accelerating Force is constant and the speed is increasing, the maximum Power will be when it's going fastest.
 
Well, no counterweight is mentioned in the formulation. I know it's not a normal thing in lifts, but...

I have my solution to the problem, that I believe to be correct, but don't want to publish it now, until MNWO gives his...
 
NTW said:
Well, no counterweight is mentioned in the formulation. I know it's not a normal thing in lifts, but...

I have my solution to the problem, that I believe to be correct, but don't want to publish it now, until MNWO gives his...
You are right, of course, about the question itself. Science education is full of test questions that could be made much better with just a little extra thought.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K