MHB Maximum value of a Quadratic Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the quadratic equation 12x - 8 - 3x^2 cannot exceed the value of 4. Participants highlight that the equation represents a downward-facing parabola due to its negative leading coefficient, indicating it has a maximum point at its vertex. The vertex can be calculated using the formula x = -b/(2a), leading to the completion of the square method to show that the maximum value is indeed 4. The largest value of the expression occurs when the squared term is zero, confirming that the expression cannot exceed 4. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of quadratic functions in this proof.
thorpelizts
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Prove that 12x-8-3x^2 can never be greater than 4.

How do you prove? Do you find he discriminant? But isn't discriminant for roots only not equations?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know what kind of proof you teacher or professor requires for this so can you provide some context for the course?

Otherwise I would say in general that a quadratic function with a negative leading coefficient is a parabola that faces downward and has a maximum point at the vertex.

If the formula for a parabola is given in the form [math]y=ax^2+bx+c[/math] then the vertex is [math]x=-\frac{b}{2a}[/math]. Again this requires some context for the course.
 
thorpelizts said:
Prove that 12x-8-3x^2 can never be greater than 4.

How do you prove? Do you find he discriminant? But isn't discriminant for roots only not equations?

This is the standard non-calculus method for finding the maximum/minimum of a quadratic expression:

You first complete the square to get:

\[-3x^2+12x-8=-3(x-2)^2+12-8=-3(x-2)^2 +4\]

Now since the largest \(-3(x-2)^2\) can be is zero the largest the whole thing can be is \(+4\).

CB
 
Last edited:
thorpelizts said:
Prove that 12x-8-3x^2 can never be greater than 4.

How do you prove? Do you find he discriminant? But isn't discriminant for roots only not equations?
It should be recognized as a negative parabola so your job is to find the vertical coordinate of the maximum turning point. Several methods have already been suggested.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K