Is Maxwell's Demon Limited by Energy Required for Door Movement?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Eric Bretschneider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Demon Maxwell's demon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of Maxwell's demon, particularly regarding the energy required to operate a door between two gas chambers. The original poster (OP) calculates that to create a temperature difference using helium gas at room temperature, the demon would need to expend at least 1.07E-15W, factoring in the mass of the door and the necessary acceleration of 8.0E+10 m/sec². Participants emphasize that while the thought experiment illustrates theoretical principles, practical considerations about material properties and energy requirements cannot be ignored. Ultimately, the consensus is that the energy extracted by the demon cannot surpass the energy needed to operate the door.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's demon thought experiment
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with kinetic theory of gases
  • Knowledge of energy calculations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Maxwell's demon and thermodynamics" for theoretical insights
  • Explore "kinetic theory of gases" to understand molecular behavior
  • Investigate "energy calculations for mechanical systems" for practical applications
  • Examine "information theory in thermodynamics" for deeper context
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the intersection of theoretical physics and practical energy calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Eric Bretschneider
Messages
92
Reaction score
51
Physics students are taught about Maxwell's demon and how by opening and closing a door between two chambers filled with gas. If the demon opens and closes the door to "concentrate" low energy molecules on one side and high energy molecules on the other side he can create a temperature difference from which work can be extracted.

My question is, why is the mass of the door and the energy required to open/close the door ignores? At about room temperature and atmospheric pressure, the collisional rate is going to be on the order of 10 GHz. If the gas is helium (diameter ~62 pm) then the tunnel between the chambers would realistically need to be at least 100 pm wide to allow an atom through.

That implies that the door would have to move at least 100 pm in order to open or close the passage and would have to operate at about 10 GHz. That requires an acceleration/deceleration rate on the order of 8.0E+10 m/sec^2. Given the distance and the mass of the door, the demon needs to expend at least 1.07E-15W to create a temperature difference.

This ignores any energy needed for sensing the speed of an approaching helium atom.

More realistically the tunnel would need to be wider and the door far more massive than a single helium atom. It would also have to withstand accelerations of about 8 billion times that of gravity.

I really question if the energy extracted by results of Maxwell's demon could actually exceed the energy needed to create the temperature difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eric Bretschneider said:
My question is, why is the mass of the door and the energy required to open/close the door ignores?
It is a thought experiment, meaning that the objective is to illustrate the theoretical principles that set a limit on the demon's efficiency. The practical issues involving the properties of realistic materials and mechanisms are beside the point - we already understand that the machine can't be built using any currently imaginable technology.

You'll see something similar in explanations of special relativity. Phrases like "a spaceship accelerates to .99c, and ..." are blithely tossed off without any regard for the difficulties involved. It can't be done, but that's irrelevant to the purpose of the discussion.
 
Eric Bretschneider said:
Those references largely deal with information and entropy. I am asking specifically about the energy needed to open/close the door between compartments.
You need to choose a door and figure it out. The point of the reference is that even in the best theoretically possible case the demon cannot accomplish the task. If we give hum a heavy door it will be much worse but who cares?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
If I understand correctly, it's already been shown that Maxwell's Demons can't effectively work against thermodynamics, for a host of reasons.

OP's argument appears to merely add a few more practical reasons why it can't. So, essentially, it's pounding another nail into a coffin that has already been nailed shut.

Or am I misinterpreting the OP?
 
I think that is the intent and the OP should by all means attempt the calculation if desired and seek specific help when necessary. He is most certainly correct but it would be useful for him to carry his calculation to the point of providing, say, an estimated lower limit.
 
hutchphd said:
You need to choose a door and figure it out. The point of the reference is that even in the best theoretically possible case the demon cannot accomplish the task. If we give hum a heavy door it will be much worse but who cares?

I am looking for more specific references on a realistic analysis before finishing the calculations I already started. You will note that I already calculated the minimum energy for operating the door based on helium at STP conditions. If there aren't specific references for a realistic analysis, then I can start writing code to get the answer.

Wikipedia is hardly a definitive source for technical information.
 
Good. I find it fascinating that the fundamental limit is the information storage and retrieval requirement.
It is unclear to me how you reached your numerical result. Do you not have to assume some physical parameters for the door (am I missing something?.. did you describe the mass you used?)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K